Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference


Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings


Forum reference:

Questions about efficient banks raise questions about efficient markets


Source: Barron's, March 17, 2023, commentary


Regional Banks’ Dividends Look Safe Despite Panic

By Lawrence C. Strauss    Updated March 17, 2023 10:24 am ET / Original March 16, 2023 8:15 pm ET

A U.S. Bancorp bank branch in Louisville, Ky.

Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg

The Silicon Valley Bank failure set off an earthquake that’s still reverberating across the regional bank landscape.

The SPDR Regional Banking exchange-traded fund (ticker: KRE) has lost about a third of its value since March 8, when the bank’s liquidity problems surfaced publicly. The upheaval raises an important question for investors in regional bank shares: How safe are their dividends, a key attraction of these stocks? Answer: safer than some fear.

Reflecting the uncertainty, many of these stocks sport high yields in the 4%-6% range because their share prices have plummeted. (Yields move inversely to prices.)

Truist Financial (TFC), a large regional bank based in Charlotte, yields 6.5%, compared with an average of 4.3% over the past 12 months. Minneapolis-based U.S. Bancorp (USB) is at 5.4%, versus its one-year average of a little more than 4%. KeyCorp (KEY), headquartered in Cleveland, is at 7%—more than three percentage points above its average of 3.7%.

These banks face plenty of headwinds that certainly will make dividend growth challenging in the short run. Case in point: First Republic Bank (FRC), which announced Thursday that it will receive an infusion of $30 billion of uninsured deposits from a group of banks, said it has suspended its dividend.

Many banks are likely to have to keep raising the rates they pay on deposits to help stabilize their funding and prevent rapid withdrawals—a dynamic that contributed to the failure of Silicon Valley Bank. Signature Bank (SBNY), one of the relatively few banks that dealt with cryptocurrency companies, also failed.

To shore up their finances, some banks might have to cut back on making loans, pressuring earnings. “The best way to preserve liquidity or build liquidity is to slow down your lending,” says Dave Ellison, a portfolio manager at Hennessy Funds and a specialist in bank stocks. “There’s less money out the door.”

And if the economy deteriorates further, possibly into a recession, banks likely would have to bolster their loan-loss reserves. All of these factors will weigh on earnings. That, in turn, will affect dividend growth.

Still, “I don’t think [these banks] are anywhere close to thinking that they have to cut dividends,” says Ellison. His sentiments were echoed by three other investment professionals with whom Barron’s spoke for this column.

One of them, Anton Schutz, longtime manager of the RMB Mendon Financial Services fund (RMBKX), which focuses on small-cap issues, thinks a more likely scenario for regional banks is a pause in share buybacks. He doesn’t foresee dividend cuts.

David Katz, chief investment officer at Matrix Asset Advisors, expects “the best/strongest banks to continue to pay their dividends.” But Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse could lead the Federal Reserve to restrict payout increases this year.

Reasonably Solid Dividends

Barring a severe recession, these banks should have the financial strength to sustain their dividends, though payout growth is likely to slow.

Company / Ticker

Recent Price

Dividend Yield

Market Value (bil)

Price Change Since March 8*

Fifth Third Bancorp / FITB





KeyCorp / KEY





M&T Bank / MTB





PNC Financial Services Group / PNC





Truist Financial / TFC





U.S. Bancorp / USB





Note: Prices and price changes as of March 15; other data as of March 16. *March 8 is when SVB Financial Group's sale of bonds from its portfolio at a loss was first disclosed publicly.

Source: FactSet

Among the regional bank stocks Katz favors are Truist Financial, U.S. Bancorp, and PNC Financial Services Group (PNC), which yields 4.8%.

Gerard Cassidy, a bank analyst at RBC Capital Markets, views the Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank blowups as outliers. “What caused the problem for these two banks was a funding issue,” he says. “The mix of deposits is important.”

In a research note, Cassidy writes that in last year’s fourth quarter, 93.8% of Signature Bank’s deposits were uninsured—meaning they were larger than the $250,000 in individual accounts covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. The tally was 89.3% at Silicon Valley Bank’s parent, SVB Financial Group (SIVB)—the second-highest level among banking companies followed by RBC Capital Markets.

In contrast, the ratio of uninsured deposits to total deposits was 57.2% at U.S. Bancorp, 54.3% at Truist, 59.3% at KeyCorp, 52.7% at M&T Bank MTB ), and 54.5% Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB), according to RBC.

In response to the regional bank crisis, federal officials said that depositors at Silicon Valley and Signature will be made whole. On March 12, the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC issued a statement saying that the Fed would “make available additional funding to eligible depositary institutions to help assure banks have the ability to meet the needs of all of their depositors.”

Katz expects that banks overall “will do fine and fully recover” and that their stocks will eventually move higher. But he cautions that risks have risen and the time frame for recovery has become extended.

Ellison expects banks to emphasize improving their liquidity, even at the expense of earnings, over the next several quarters.

Cassidy agrees that these banks are likely to be less profitable for a time, but he considers their dividends secure. He sees a much different situation this time, versus what happened in the financial crisis 15 years ago. In 2008-09, a major credit crisis clobbered payouts. “We don’t have that this time,” he says.

Back then, plenty of banks cut or suspended their dividends. In early 2009, for example, U.S. Bancorp slashed its payout to a nickel a share from 42.5 cents. KeyCorp halved its dividend, to 18.75 cents, in March 2008, then trimmed it twice more, eventually down to just a penny.

In a recent note, Cassidy said he expects “buying opportunities will present themselves” after some near-term bumps on deposit outflows. He cited banks such as Fifth Third Bancorp, yielding 5.2%; KeyCorp; PNC; M&T, 4.2%; Truist; and U.S. Bancorp.

Although Cassidy doesn’t expect any of the larger regional banks that he follows to cut their dividends, a severe economic downturn would change his expectations. “If you’re going to tell me that we’re going to have a recession this year with unemployment at 10%, then all bets are off,” he warns.

Bottom line: Investors must closely monitor news about the regional banks, even if most are unlikely to cut their dividends. Forewarned is forearmed, especially in times like these.


Write to Lawrence C. Strauss at


Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.