Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings
 
 
 

Forum distribution:

More observations of professional activists' efforts to demonstrate their value

 

 

For other recent reports of the current practices of professional activist fund managers, see

Also see recently published academic analyses of actual performance data (included) for several prominent activists:

 

Source: Reuters, March 8, 2023, article

 

 

March 8, 20234:31 PM EST

 

With dealmaking slowing, activist hedge funds target companies' top brass

Svea Herbst-Bayliss

 

The Charging Bull, or Wall Street Bull, is pictured in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., January 16, 2019. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo/File Photo

NEW YORK, March 8 (Reuters) - Activist hedge funds that often push companies to sell themselves or divest divisions are increasingly calling for top executives to be replaced, a change in tactics driven by a slowdown in mergers and acquisitions (M&A).

These investors called for the removal of personnel at 60 U.S. companies last year, a 46% year-on-year increase, according to data from research firm Insightia. That was the most since 2017, the data show.

The trend reflects an overall decline in M&A activity as higher interest rates put the brakes on economic growth, fund managers and their advisers say. The total value of M&A fell 37% to $3.66 trillion last year after hitting an all-time high of $5.9 trillion in 2021, according to Dealogic data.

The push to oust executives also highlights the hedge funds' frustration with companies' stock performance after the S&P 500 Index tumbled 20% last year, said Ken Squire, who tracks activists at research firm 13D Monitor. Last year, activist investors' portfolios were down an average 17%, according to Hedge Fund Research, a poor showing after three years of double-digit gains.

“In down to flat markets, a failing CEO has few places to hide," said Squire.

Hedge funds that have successfully called for top executives to leave in recent months include Soroban Capital Partners, which helped oust railroad operator Union Pacific Corp's (UNP.N) CEO Lance Fritz, Ancora Holdings, which contributed to the exit of department store operator Kohl's Corp's (KSS.N) CEO Michelle Gass, and Sachem Head Capital Management, which targeted Pietro Satriano, the CEO of food distributor US Foods Holding Corp (USFD.N).

“When performance is poor, activists won't sit still," said Avinash Mehrotra, co-head of Goldman Sachs Group Inc's (GS.N) mergers and acquisitions group in the Americas and global head of its activism defense practice.

According to Goldman Sachs data, one out of four S&P 500 companies have an activist investor in their stock. There are also challenges to companies that are being negotiated behind closed doors.

"For every publicly announced situation, our team is actively defending against two to three campaigns that will hopefully never see the light of day," Mehrotra said.

To be sure, the activist hedge funds are not abandoning their playbook of calling for companies to sell themselves or their assets, even as the chances of a deal have become more remote. Such requests in the United States were up 19% last year, according to Insightia.

Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss; Editing by Anna Driver
 

© 2023 Reuters.
 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.