Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference


Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings


Forum distribution:

New business model challenges traditional ISS/Glass Lewis advisers for defining shareholder voting policies



Source: Reuters, June 2, 2022, article


June 2, 2022

3:31 PM EDT

Climate Change | Corporate Governance | ESG Regulation

Shareholder Activism | Corporate Counsel


Engine No. 1 rushes to back ESG disclosures at top companies

By Ross Kerber


Signage is seen at an Exxon gas station in Brooklyn, New York City, U.S., November 23, 2021.

REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

June 2 (Reuters) - Sustainability-focused hedge fund Engine No. 1 has backed 83% of shareholder resolutions on environmental, social and governance (ESG) topics at top U.S. companies so far this year as it looks to arm investors with more information, leaders said.

Ballot items, such as several at Exxon Mobil Corp calling for more details around reduced plastic use and emissions-cut scenarios, help investors understand a business, Engine No. 1 founder and executive chairman, Christopher James, said in an interview with Reuters on Wednesday.

"We're always going be in favor of more data," James said.

The voting by Engine No. 1 - detailed in disclosures by its $347 million Transform 500 exchange-traded fund - contrast with some corporate election trends during the current proxy season. read more

The votes also show how James and Chief Executive Jennifer Grancio have shifted focus compared with last year when Engine No. 1 forced out three of four Exxon directors it targeted over what the firm called the company's slow response to climate change.

For now, James waved off challenges to directors elsewhere.

"We don't have anything on the docket," he said. Talks with firm holdings like General Motors Corp on battery technology are "constructive" he said.

At Exxon's annual meeting on May 25, Engine No. 1 supported all 11 of the company's director nominees and supported four of seven shareholder resolutions.

Shifts under Exxon's new board, such as moving its headquarters to Houston and hiring senior leaders from outside show "there has clearly been a huge and fundamental change" in how the firm treats climate risk, James said.

One resolution the firm opposed called for Exxon to set emissions-reductions targets including for "Scope 3" emissions created via use of its products.

Proponent Mark van Baal of activist group Follow This called the vote "an inexplicable U-turn" compared with last year when Engine No. 1 highlighted Exxon's lack of Scope 3 disclosure.

James said the vote was justified since Scope 3 accounting methods are still uncertain.

James also said he agreed with recent criticism by Tesla Inc CEO Elon Musk that current systems use to rate corporate ESG performance are flawed, which Musk made after Tesla was dropped from a high-profile ESG index. read more

"For Tesla not to get credit for the decarbonization drive they're doing, I think he's right," James said.

Reporting by Ross Kerber Editing by Marguerita Choy

© 2022 Reuters.


This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.