Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference


Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings


Forum distribution:

Establishing professional recognition for investment analysis


Source: The New York Times, September 30, 2021 article



Only 35% Pass Wall St.’s Toughest Test. How Much Does That Matter?

This summer, a record low number of C.F.A. test takers passed the first level of the notoriously difficult exams, reviving an old debate about the merits of the qualification.

Outside the New York Stock Exchange in September. Victor Llorente for The New York Times

By Lananh Nguyen

Sept. 30, 2021

When the pandemic hit, Irene Zhu decided to explore switching careers from tourism to finance. A lifelong math whiz, Ms. Zhu, 37, set her sights on becoming a chartered financial analyst, a highly coveted professional qualification in the investing world. But to do so, she would need to pass three notoriously difficult tests, the first of which she sat for in February — after staying up well past 1 a.m. on many nights studying.

She failed.

“I have to say, it was pretty messy,” Ms. Zhu said in a video chronicling her experience. “What made the C.F.A. exam really challenging for me is the time and effort that I needed to put in,” she said.

The process of earning a C.F.A. after one’s name has always been grueling: Candidates are expected to master 3,000 pages of material and demonstrate their ability to analyze companies’ financial statements, forecast investment profits and manage conflicts of interest, alongside a vast swath of concepts and scenarios.

The pandemic made that slog harder. Ms. Zhu, based in Melbourne, Australia, was among roughly 140,000 people who sat for one of the three qualifying exams required for a C.F.A. this year. Only 35 percent passed. Of those who took their first exam in the most recent round in July, the pass rate was 22 percent — the lowest on record since the nonprofit CFA Institute began administering the tests in 1963. On average, fewer than half of C.F.A. test takers across all levels pass.

The record lows revived a longstanding debate among finance industry veterans: How useful is the credential for success on Wall Street? And how does it compare to the industry’s most popular graduate degree — the M.B.A., or master of business administration? Those questions — M.B.A. vs. C.F.A. vs. nothing at all — pop up periodically in the industry, but this time around they carry more urgency, especially with registrations for the C.F.A. program down from their 2019 peak. In the midst of the pandemic, Wall Street’s biggest firms have also been forced to rethink some of the rites of passage that have long gone unquestioned — like long hours at the mercy of bosses or buttoned-up attire.

C.F.A. candidates whose exams were canceled or postponed because of lockdowns and hardships during the pandemic had poorer results, the institute said after auditing data from the last two rounds of subpar scores. Although the tests are typically offered twice a year, they were offered several times this year because of the pandemic.

“People have had, in many cases, their lives upturned — we know they’re working from home virtually, there’s a fatigue setting in,” said Margaret Franklin, the chief executive of the CFA Institute, which is based in Charlottesville, Va. “There’s kind of the optimal study conditions, and then there’s the reality of Covid,” she said.

Margaret Franklin, the chief of the CFA Institute. She acknowledges the hardships faced by test takers. Tom Jamieson for The New York Times

Many of today’s top financial managers hold CFA credentials, including Marty Flanagan, the chief executive of Invesco, which manages $1.5 trillion, and Heather Brilliant, chief executive of Diamond Hill Capital Management. Other top leaders in the asset management business, including the BlackRock chief Laurence D. Fink, do not.

Howard Marks, the billionaire investor and co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management, a fund that specializes in distressed debt, holds both a C.F.A. title and an M.B.A. degree. A firm supporter of the C.F.A. program, Mr. Marks said the title was valuable because it was the closest thing the money management business had to an industry qualification.

The C.F.A. doesn’t tell anybody whether so-and-so is a good investor — it only goes to the question of academic preparation, but it’s clearly a plus,” Mr. Marks said. “You can take an M.B.A. and not have any investment courses, so an M.B.A. is clearly not sufficient,” he added.

A recent round of poor results prompted Jared Dillian, the author of an investing newsletter, to write an essay last month with a pointed headline: “Wall Street’s CFA Program Is a Colossal Waste of Time.” Mr. Dillian was blasted by C.F.A.s who were quick to defend the merits of their hard-won credential. But he said he also received many private messages that concurred with his assessment.

Early in his career, Mr. Dillian passed the first-level C.F.A. exam, but later failed the second level. He considers his M.B.A. from the University of San Francisco more valuable because it enabled him to network and learn from business leaders while at school.

“It’s better than sitting at your desk at home, banging your head against the wall, memorizing formulas,” Mr. Dillian said.

An essay Jared Dillian wrote called the C.F.A. program a “colossal waste of time.” Leslie Ryann McKellar for The New York Times

The CFA Institute first offered exams in the 1960s as a way to set professional standards for financial analysts who manage investments for clients. During that decade, an average of 1,500 people took the tests each year. Of those, 73 percent to 94 percent passed.

Over time, the C.F.A. curriculum came to be seen as foundational knowledge for analysts and portfolio managers who were willing to plow through the material to gain an edge. But as the designation became more popular, pass rates dropped. The number of candidates peaked above 270,000 in 2019, and an average of 44.2 percent passed.

While exam registrations are down from their 2019 peak — exacerbated by the pandemic — roughly 1.7 million people remain enrolled in the program, of which 236,000 people are booked for coming tests. Each exam clocks in at four-and-a-half hours. Registration, exams and materials cost about $3,000 — far cheaper than the average cost of an M.B.A. program. Holders of the C.F.A. designation have to pay annual membership fees to keep their titles.

“It’s a great certification to have, but given the time and demands to obtain it, it does make sense to plan appropriately,” said Paul Sorbera, president of the Wall Street executive search firm Alliance Consulting. Advanced qualifications can lift an employee’s earning power, but higher compensation isn’t guaranteed, Mr. Sorbera said.

Michael Lin, a 28-year-old amateur boxer who received the C.F.A. designation in August after passing all his exams on the first try, compared the effort to training for an athletic tournament. Mr. Lin, who was working at Wells Fargo’s wealth management division at the time, started by studying several hours a day outside of work, then added weekends, and took one to two weeks off before each exam to study full time. The pandemic lockdown allowed Mr. Lin to hunker down and hit the books, unlike some of his colleagues and friends who had bigger disruptions.

“Mentality is a huge part of it,” said Mr. Lin. While a C.F.A. is highly specialized for money managers and analysts, it is also a solid credential that is much more cost-effective than a master’s, he said. Now that he is a chartered financial analyst, “I definitely don’t want to drop a couple hundred grand for an M.B.A.,” Mr. Lin said.

Florian Campuzan, an independent stock trader in Versailles, France, was not as lucky. Mr. Campuzan is pursuing a C.F.A. in hopes that the knowledge and prestige gained from the credential will bolster his consulting jobs, such as advising companies about their commodity hedging. But he fell short on his final exam because busy equity markets took up more of his time in the first quarter.

Mr. Campuzan appeared to take the news in good humor, posting on Twitter: “Failed CFA level 3,” with a thumbs up emoji. In an interview later, he was more philosophical. “Trading is the school of hard knocks and it teaches you to be humble — it teaches you to be a hardworking person and it teaches you to accept failure as a part of the journey,” Mr. Campuzan said. “This time, I failed, but next time, I will succeed.”

Ms. Zhu, who took her first C.F.A. test in February hoping to switch careers, was discouraged. “Whoever wants to take the C.F.A. really needs the mental and physical time to be dedicated to the exam,” she said. Toward the end of the six-month period she had allocated to herself to prep for the exam — with two children at home and a husband also working remotely during the pandemic — Ms. Zhu said she felt that she was running out of time.

After learning that she hadn’t passed, Ms. Zhu decided pursuing the C.F.A. wasn’t worthwhile. “I was a little bit disappointed, but then again, even if I passed level one, it seems to be a long journey to pass level two and level three and the charter.”

Instead, she plans to build a career in finance partly by making YouTube videos where she shares her insights on investing.


Lananh Nguyen covers Wall Street for The New York Times. She previously spent more than a decade at Bloomberg News in New York and London, where she wrote about banking and financial markets.

A version of this article appears in print on Oct. 3, 2021, Section BU, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: How the Pandemic Made a Tough Test Even Tougher.

© 2021 The New York Times Company



This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.