Financial Times, October 1, 2019 commentary of Leo Strine: "Workers must be at the heart of company priorities | A judge’s manifesto for fairer and more sustainable capitalism" [Leading corporate governance authority moves from court to political definition of rules]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference


Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings


Forum distribution:

Leading corporate governance authority moves from court to political definition of rules


For an interview of Mr. Strine elaborating on the political applications of his views below, and for his more detailed paper to be delivered this week, see

Note: Leo E. Strine recently resigned from his position as Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court. For examples of his influential legal views and their socio-economic context concerning issues addressed by Forum participants, see the articles referenced in the interview cited above.


Source: Financial Times, October 1, 2019 commentary



Opinion Corporate governance

Workers must be at the heart of company priorities

A judge’s manifesto for fairer and more sustainable capitalism

Leo Strine



A rally to end the partial US government shutdown in January. US workers are more skilled than ever but share less and less in corporate profits © Bloomberg

 Leo Strine   [OCTOBER 1, 2019]

The US corporate governance system has lost sight of its purpose. Companies have become more responsive to the immediate desires of the stock market but are failing to move quickly toward sustainable business practices, adequately invest in human capital and, most importantly, fairly share gains from corporate profits with the workers who create them.

The disjunction comes at a time when many American workers have become forced capitalists. Tax rules demand that employees saving for retirement or education put their money into equity and bond mutual funds in 401(k) and 529 plans.

These long-term savings objectives should align well with running sustainable, responsible businesses. Diversified worker-investors do not benefit when some companies offload the costs of their activities, such as pollution and carbon emissions, on to everyone else. As human beings who consume products, and depend on good jobs, they suffer when companies harm the environment, defraud or injure consumers and move production overseas.

Critically, 99 per cent of Americans owe most of their wealth to their jobs. As a result, the vast majority of investors need companies to do business in a way that provides Americans with access to good jobs, sustainable wage growth and a fair share of the profits that businesses generate. Yet our corporate governance system has increasingly failed to deliver. From the late 1940s to the early 1970s, workers and investors did share in the wealth generated by a strong, growing economy. But since then that social compact has frayed: worker productivity has risen by about 70 per cent, but hourly pay has grown by only 12 per cent. Meanwhile, corporate profits have hit record highs. US workers are more educated, more skilled and do more to create corporate profits, but they share far less in the fruits of that labour.

The Business Roundtable, made up of top chief executives and institutional investors such as Vanguard and BlackRock now acknowledge that we need to make our capitalist system work better for the many. But scepticism rightly exists over whether this woke talk will be backed up by real action. Here are some concrete steps that could make a difference.

Workers must be given far more priority by companies. We should appoint board committees focused on fair treatment of company employees and those who work for its subcontractors. Business leaders must also support sensible labour law reforms giving unions a fairer opportunity to represent and bargain for their workers. We must make it easier to hold companies accountable by requiring better disclosure of how they treat workers and whether they operate in an ethical, sustainable, environmentally responsible manner.

But companies cannot act more responsibly without the support of the institutional investors who control worker-investors’ capital and thus of corporate shares. Some big money managers are starting to consider environmental, social, and governance factors. That is not enough. Institutional investors should be focused on EESG, adding an “E” for the interests of company employees. They should align their voting policies with the interests of worker-investors who need not just sustainable corporate profits but also good jobs, clean air and safe products. It makes no sense to require companies to disclose their EESG performance unless institutional investors also have to do so.

Other complementary measures are needed to promote a fair and sustainable capitalism. We must change tax and accounting rules that encourage speculation and rapid portfolio turnover, rather than productive, sound, long-term investments. Investments in employees should get as much credit as investments in robots. A financial transactions tax, capital gains tax reform, and elimination of rules that reduce the tax rate on “carried interest” generated by private equity would all increase the fairness of our tax system and discourage socially unproductive speculation.

The resulting revenues should fund infrastructure and basic research to improve US competitiveness and quality of life. We can supercharge our efforts to address climate change and set a global example. Investing in research, infrastructure and training will create jobs in the US, help workers in carbon-intensive industries shift to emerging clean energy companies, spark innovation and enhance America’s long-term international competitiveness.

US public corporations are not playthings. They create jobs, produce goods and services that consumers depend on, affect the environment we live in and build wealth that help Americans lead more secure lives. They are societally chartered institutions of enormous importance and value. Those who govern them should be accountable for the generation of durable wealth for their workers and ordinary investors.

We need a new system that supports sustainable and fair wealth creation within a system of enlightened capitalism. It should align the interests of institutional investors and corporations with those of the workers whose capital they control. With some modest sacrifices by every interest that wields economic power, we can make the economy work better for all Americans.

The writer is chief justice of the Delaware Supreme Court and author of ‘Toward Fair and Sustainable Capitalism’, prepared for this week’s ‘A New Deal’ conference in Washington






This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.