Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference


Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings


Forum distribution:

Professional reactions to commentary on use of new communication tools to restrict instead of expand investor access


For the commentary to which the article below responds, and for references to other reactions, see

Note: The "Shareholder Forum" service that Broadridge Financial Solutions offers to support the "Virtual Shareholder Meeting" product presented in its website describing the process addressed in the article below, was introduced by Broadridge in  the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program but is not related in any way to the trademarked Shareholder Forum™ owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc. We have asked Broadridge to use a different name for their service that does not suggest Forum support or endorsement, or any determination that Broadridge's services conform with the 2010 Forum program's marketplace definition of "Standards for Fair Conduct of Shareholder Meetings Using Electronic Communications."


Source: Directors & Boards, April 7, 2017 article


Weighing the Virtual-Only Shareholder Meeting



The perils of ditching face-to-face gatherings


By Eve Tahmincioglu

Duke Energy will hold its annual shareholder meeting virtually on May 4, abandoning its long-standing in-person gathering.

"The live webcast will greatly increase our shareholders' access to the meeting, making it easy and inexpensive for them to participate," said Steve Young, Duke Energy executive vice president and chief financial officer, in a statement announcing the move last month.

The virtual-only meeting decision, however, didn’t make all shareholders happy with many voicing their concerns.

“It’s a deflection,” said Jim Warren, executive director of NC WARN, a Durham nonprofit and Duke shareholder that has been highly critical of the electric utility’s practices, according to a recent story in the Charlotte Observer

Duke Energy and a growing number of corporations are moving to the virtual-only shareholder model in order to reach more shareholders and to save money. And some believe its time may have come.

“The annual general meeting, in my humble view, is an exercise in ritual,” says Michael Useem, management professor and director for the Center for Leadership and Change Management at Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania . “The number of people, the faction of investors that come to these is just tiny.”

Regarding concerns by some shareholders that executives and board members are just trying to dodge angry investors and tough questions, he says, “there may be something hidden, but so little genuine content  comes out of in-person meeting, it’s not clear to me what will be kept from the clear light of day.”

That may be the thinking among a growing number of companies.

According to research from Broadbridge 155 public companies opted for virtual-only meetings last year, a steady increase that began in 2010. 


“Although our technology service was provided in just 3% of shareholder meetings last year, the technology has become more accepted and adoption is on the rise,” says Cathy Conlon, Vice President of Corporate Issuer Product and Strategy at Broadridge.  “Greater numbers of companies and shareholders welcome the greater conveniences, cost savings, and enhanced communications features of virtual shareholder meetings.”

Even though there’s been a precipitous increase, the majority of corporations still opt for the in-person and hybrid models. “It’s not a tsunami,” explains Ron Schneider, Director of Corporate Governance at Donnelley Financial Solutions.

He adds there’s a growing movement to derail the growth.

Indeed, earlier this month, New York City Comptroller Scott M. Stringer sent a letter to more than a dozen S&P 500 companies denouncing the rapid rise of the virtual-only meeting, saying he would “recommend that the New York City Pension Funds adopt a policy to vote against directors at companies that continue to hold ‘virtual-only’ meetings.”

So what should companies do? “Like almost anything there’s unintended consequences,” says Schneider.  “It’s not a one size fits all.”

Companies are well aware that there will be some investors who’ll object to doing away with face-to-face meetings and that it could bring negative media attention, he says.

Schneider offers some things to keep in mind before going virtual:

  • Consider the financial cost benefit. You could downgrade your in-person meeting, offering less food or giveaways, for example; or hold it at a company facility, saving the cost of renting a space.

  • Think about your ownership base. If you’re a target of known activists, or if there’s a shareholder proposal and they want to come to the meeting and share the proposal, understand there will be some negative pushback from those investors, publicized through social media. You may get dinged on the vote.

  • Context matters. If performance is fine and there are no controversies brewing that might be one environment to consider bypassing an in-person meeting.

  • If the perception is that a company is trying to muzzle or limit the ability of investors at the meeting to make their views heard, management has to consider whether that perception is worth it.


© 2017 Directors & Boards. All rights reserved.

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.