Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference


Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings


Forum reference:

Investor survey of activist and governance issues encouraging engagement


Source: The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, August 18, 2014 posting

Posted by Yaron Nili, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Monday August 18, 2014 at 8:52 am

Editor’s Note: The following post comes to us from Bridget Neill, Director of Regulatory Policy at Ernst & Young, and is based on an Ernst & Young publication by Ruby Sharma and Allie M. Rutherford. The complete publication is available here.

Nearly 40 investor representatives shared with us their key priorities for the 2014 proxy season. We review the developments around these topics over the 2014 proxy season through shareholder proposal submissions, investor voting trends, proxy statement disclosures and behind-the-scenes company-investor engagement.

Key Developments in the 2014 Proxy Season

Activist investors are becoming more active and influential: Nearly 150 campaigns by hedge fund activists were launched in just the first half of this year. Both companies and long-term institutional investors are learning to navigate this changing landscape.

Activists are now:

» Targeting larger companies—no company or market is immune

» Advancing efforts through dialogue and collaboration with long-term institutional investors, including identifying companies with governance concerns as potential targets

» Developing more sophisticated sector- and company-specific analysis

» Using 14a-8 shareholder proposals and other proxy mechanisms to call attention to their concerns

» Winning more board seats, in large part through reaching settlements with the companies rather than going to a shareholder vote

Attention is turning to board composition and renewal strategies: Both investors and boards are placing greater attention on whether the right directors are in the boardroom. They are also focused on whether boards are regularly refreshing and providing an exit for directors whose expertise is no longer relevant.

Company-investor dynamics are evolving as engagement becomes mainstream: Company-investor engagement on governance topics continues to grow. While executive compensation remains the primary engagement driver, a variety of other governance topics—board and executive leadership, board composition and diversity, and sustainability practices and reporting, to name a few—are increasingly part of those conversations.

Ongoing Proxy Season Trends

» Shareholder proposal submissions remain high, with a focus on environmental and social topics: In recent years, the number of shareholder proposal submissions has been at an all-time high, with proposals on environmental and social topics accounting for the largest category of proposals submitted at 45% of the total.

» SOP support holds steady: More than 2,200 companies so far this year have gauged investor support for their compensation policies and practices through a say-on-pay (SOP) vote. This marked the second SOP vote for companies that elected triennial SOP frequencies. While most companies respond quickly to low SOP votes, a handful of companies remain unresponsive to shareholder opposition to their pay practices. Over the past four years, 23 companies have not secured majority support for their SOP votes for two or more years.

» Annual director elections by majority vote and independent board leaders increase: Many investors favor the annual election of all directors under a majority vote standard and want to see boards with a strong independent chair or lead director. Companies that do not have these practices may be the focus of shareholder engagement or recipients of shareholder proposals.

Some large asset managers are encouraging companies to adopt annual director elections and majority voting through letters to boards and engagement conversations. Most investors are unified in their beliefs—and will support proposals that implement annual elections and majority voting.

13 Year 2000 data based on Investor Responsibility Research Center, Board Practices/Board Pay 2002.

Toward More Meaningful Communications—and Disclosure

As investors turn their focus to the boardroom and continue to use shareholder proposals to effect governance changes, it is important that company communication efforts—through direct dialogue with investors and proxy statement disclosures—become more effective. The way forward is likely more focused and purpose-driven company-investor engagements and more meaningful proxy disclosures.

The complete publication is available here.


All copyright and trademarks in content on this site are owned by their respective owners. Other content © 2014 The President and Fellows of Harvard College.


This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.