Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference


Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings



In the Moxy Vote announcement of its closing, reported below, the company stated that its support of individual investor activism had generated 197,000 subscribers to its emails and that members had voted 30,000,000 shares using the advice of its 56 "advocate organizations" since the 2009 launch of operations. The number of companies to which these shareholder votes related was not indicated.

For context, Broadridge has reported distributing proxy material for 347 billion shares and processing responsive votes for 235 billion shares (68%) during this year's three month proxy season.

Most estimates suggest that fewer than 10% of individual shareholders exercise their voting rights. It can be assumed that substantially all the "absent" votes shown in the following graph are those of individual investors, since most fund managers satisfy a perceived fiduciary duty to vote their shares.

Shareholder Support Rankings

Votes for Management Compensation

Shareholder Support Rankings™ are based on total voting rights for all classes of stock as of record date. "Absent" votes include abstentions, broker non-votes and shares not present. All data is from SEC filing records of subject companies, provided according to Shareholder Forum specifications by Morningstar, Inc.

Ó Copyright 2012 The Shareholder Forum, Inc.


Source: Reuters, July 11, 2012 article


Shareholder website closing, cites complex voting rules

Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:02am IST

* Moxy Vote launched in 2009, drew 200,000 users

* Co-founder Schlegel cites fees and complex voting rules

By Ross Kerber

July 10 (Reuters) - Shareholder voting service Moxy Vote said it will shut down on July 31, ending a pioneering effort to give ordinary investors more say in how companies are run.

The West Chester, Pennsylvania, company said on Tuesday it was losing money amid complex rules governing how companies interact with retail shareholders.

In the wake of the financial crisis, governance specialists hoped mom-and-pop investors would press companies to become more accountable. Along with Moxy Vote, other new on-line efforts include and

All aim to help small investors become better overseers of their assets, such as allowing them to track the annual proxy elections where corporations chose directors and seek approvals for executive pay. Frustrated shareholders staged several revolts in the just-ended spring proxy season, such as rejecting the pay package of Citigroup Inc Chief Executive Vikram Pandit in April.

But now the on-line efforts look challenged themselves. In an interview, Moxy Vote co-founder Mark Schlegel said his 10-person startup faced two main problems as it tried to make its website as a place for investors to vote their shares.

First, some brokerage companies would not pass along shareholder ballots, saying they would do so only when required by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules. Also, proxy agents have charged Moxy Vote significant fees that public companies would not reimburse.

Both problems became too much for the three-year-old company, Schlegel said, even though it had about 200,000 registered users and was growing quickly.

"The headwinds were too strong for us. Until the regulatory environment changes, it's going to be a tough go for anybody like a Moxy Vote," he said.


Large brokers that worked with Moxy Vote included E*Trade Financial Corp and TD Ameritrade Holding Corp, Schlegel said. He declined to name the brokerage firms that did not pass along ballots and said Moxy Vote received a lot of help from the close-knit proxy industry, where Moxy Vote's shutdown quickly drew notice.

"It is no easy matter to engage large numbers of retail investors in corporate governance and proxy voting and Moxy Vote is to be commended for its efforts," said Chuck Callan, senior vice-president at Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. It is the largest provider of proxy services for investors who own shares through brokerage accounts.

Broadridge's role can put it at odds with transfer agents that help companies communicate directly with investors. But Charles Rossi, president of a transfer-agent trade group, also praised Moxy Vote's efforts.

"Because of the system we operate under, it's unfortunate to see Moxy Vote fail," said Rossi, who is also an executive vice-president of services firm Computershare in Massachusetts.

Proxy voting has various overseers, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, stock exchanges and FINRA, and several reviews are under way on how to improve the cumbersome system.

An SEC spokeswoman did not respond to questions about Moxy Vote. Current rules left Moxy Vote in limbo and unable to pay bills it ran up processing votes, said James McRitchie, publisher of the website and an informal adviser to Schlegel.

"The more successful Moxy Vote was at getting people to vote on their platform, the more money they lost," he said.


Retail shareholders often own less than 20 percent of a typical company's stock, but they can provide key swing votes in close proxy contests.

Backed by private investors, Moxy Vote aimed to gather small investors to help them study up for corporate contests.

To make money, Moxy Vote charged institutions with an interest in reaching smaller investors, such as to lobby for their votes. Clients included public companies, activist hedge funds and pension funds.

The company's website,, grew quickly from just 5,000 registered users a year ago and attracted some advertising. But it failed to gain the scale to pay its bills, Schlegel said. The shutdown decision was hard after investors put $4.5 million into the company, but inevitable because of the slow pace of regulatory change, he said.

Some venture-capital backing came from principals of TFS Capital, a registered investment adviser, according to Moxy Vote's website.

Schlegel said the firm might continue some aspects of its service and praised other online efforts still under way to engage shareholders.

"Everybody has pushed the ball a little further down the field and I hope we've done that as well," he added.

©2012 Thomson Reuters.



This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.