Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also 2011-2019 analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Regulatory priorities for supporting public capital investment in the production of goods and services

 

For previous reports of the regulatory concerns about buybacks addressed by SEC Chairman Clayton in his testimony reported below, see

The full transcript of Chairman Clayton's testimony is available on the SEC website here.

Other reports and research addressing the use of corporate capital to repurchase stock can be found in the "Stock Buyback Policy" reference section of a Forum project that had addressed a company-specific example, and in the online user-input "Buyback Analysis" calculator developed in a Forum workshop.

For past Forum attention to required regulatory updating of proxy processes noted below, see the reports cited in the "Legal and Regulatory" section of the reference page for the Forum's public program that established marketplace standards for shareholder "E-Meetings."

 

Source: Pensions & Investments, December 11, 2018 article

 


Washington

SEC chairman shares priorities in Senate oversight hearing

BY HAZEL BRADFORD    DECEMBER 11, 2018 3:34 PM

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Jay Clayton Bloomberg

Corporate stock buybacks and Brexit's impact on U.S. markets were the biggest questions for Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Jay Clayton at a Senate Banking Committee oversight hearing Tuesday.

Other issues raised were possible proxy voting reforms, executive compensation and ESG investing factors including climate change.

Maryland Democrat Chris Van Hollen pressed Mr. Clayton on whether 2017 tax cuts intended to stimulate more capital investment were being misdirected to company executives. With an estimated $800 billion in stock buybacks since tax reform legislation passed, there is "mounting evidence that insiders are cashing out after a buyback," Mr. Van Hollen said, telling Mr. Clayton, "I think a little more work needs to be done on that."

Questioned by Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., about whether buybacks harm long-term Main Street investors. Mr. Clayton said the SEC does not have authority over a company's capital allocation decisions, "but I agree with a number of observers in terms of how a company communicates. We can do a better job around disclosure," including on executive pay.

"If the purpose is to drive up value for an individual (executive) ... that's a problematic situation," Mr. Clayton told the committee.

Brexit "is very much front of my mind," Mr. Clayton said. "One reason I am worried about Brexit is that there are a number of issues that seem to get kicked down the road."

On proxy voting, Mr. Clayton said the SEC is looking for short-term fixes to "proxy plumbing" — how votes travel from end investors back to the company — and wants industry to propose them. On the issue of proxy advisers, "I think there's broad agreement that there are elements of the proxy ecosystem that can be improved," said Mr. Clayton, adding that he is not "wedded" to running a potential vote recommendation through the company before it is published.

One near-term priority for the SEC is finalizing a Dodd-Frank Act hedging disclosure regulation calling for companies to report whether they permit directors, officers and employees to hedge against drops in company stock, Mr. Clayton told the panel.

Contact Hazel Bradford at hbradford@pionline.com ·


© 2018 Crain Communications Inc.

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.