Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Selecting investments based on competitive use of capital to produce goods and services

 

For the analytical tool referenced in the article below to research competitive use of capital, see

Returns on Corporate Capital (ROCC)

Note that for purposes of research integrity the definition of industry competitors for ROCC analyses is based on the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) specified by the company itself in its reporting to the SEC. In some cases, users may find it more meaningful to make their own selections of competing companies for comparison, following the example of the article below.

 

Source: Dow Jones MarketWatch, May 29, 2018 article

How to select oil stocks? Find companies that know how to handle money

Published: May 29, 2018 2:56 p.m. ET

This stock screen identifies energy companies — Valero, Phillips 66 and Marathon, among them — that deploy investors’ money most efficiently

Bloomberg

Valero Energy has been a solid performer through the extended period of low oil prices
 

 

By

Philip

van Doorn


 Investing columnist

 

 

As oil prices slumped to less than $30 a barrel in January 2016, many U.S. producers with heavy debt burdens suddenly found themselves in serious trouble.

The result: Earnings turned to losses, and stock prices cratered. And then came the cost cuts, as companies struggled to dig out from potentially crippling debt.

But now, a new set of data shows which U.S.-traded energy companies have deployed capital most efficiently. (Please see the table below.) The top companies include Valero Energy Corp. VLO Phillips 66 PSX  and Marathon Petroleum Corp. MRO among refiners, and also Core Laboratories CLB and Oceaneering International OII among oil-services companies. 

Some companies with high return on corporate capital (ROCC) have seen their share prices rise more than that of their rivals as well as the S&P 500 Index over the past five years. But the link sometimes isn’t so clear. (Again, see the table below.) ROCC, incidentally, means net income plus interest expense and income taxes, divided by the ending balance of total assets less total liabilities other than interest-bearing debt.

Even as West Texas crude CLN8 has more than doubled to about $67 a barrel since reaching a low two and a half years ago, conditions seem ripe for the more efficient oil players. Oil producers have learned their lesson and worked on cost controls. Credit Suisse analyst William Featherston said in a report this month that the average break-even price for the oil exploration and production companies he covers was $43 a barrel in the fourth quarter, below the $56 average in early 2015.

Here’s a one-year chart showing the percentage increase in West Texas crude prices against the S&P Composite 1500 energy sector’s total return:

FactSet
 

Stock investors are not yet believers in the oil-price recovery.

A review of the S&P 500 Index energy sector shed light on oil refiners — the best-performing industry group through the oil bust and (partial) recovery.

We then revisited energy companies with low leverage (debt), which have for the most part fared well during the recovery.

Now that the Shareholder Forum has updated its annual return on corporate capital (ROCC) data, we can look at a large number of energy companies and compare performance within their reported industry groups.

Return on corporate capital

Each company’s ROCC is compared to its industry competitors, based on the company’s Standard Industrial Classification (SIC), which also comes from Securities and Exchange Commission annual reports. You can access ROCC comparisons for U.S.-traded companies here.

ROCC is meant to help investors understand how well a company’s management has used the capital it has raised through selling shares or borrowing money to produce goods and services for a profit.

Investors can find recovery plays or potential bargain stocks that might be temporarily undervalued by the market, but concentrating on a company’s success in its core business relative to competitors is a better way to limit risk while improving long-term returns overall, says Gary Lutin of the Shareholder Forum.

A company’s ROCC is compared to the aggregated assets and income data for the entire SIC group (of companies publicly traded in the U.S., no matter their size), excluding for the subject company. This means that the industry ROCCs for two companies in the same group may be different.

ROCC is most meaningful within industries, because some industries require more investment capital than others.

One drawback to ROCC is that companies’ reported SIC codes may not always perfectly match their core businesses, especially if the companies are conglomerates. So screening stocks by ROCC has its drawbacks, as does any other initial screening method. But it can help you pare a list before doing your own research to consider how well a company is likely to compete over the next decade.

ROCC winners among energy companies

The S&P 1500 Composite Index is made up of the S&P 500 Index SPX the S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index MID  and the S&P Small-Cap Index SML There are 89 companies in the S&P 1500 energy sector, and the Shareholder Forum was able to gather sufficient data to calculate five-year ROCC averages for 83 of them. Of that group, 39 have negative average ROCC over the past five years, leaving us with 44 companies with positive average ROCC.

Of the remaining 44 energy companies, 23 have five-year average ROCC higher than the average for their SIC group. Here are all 23, ranked within each group. The larger groups are listed first, and there are five SIC groups with only one company represented.

Company

Ticker

Five-year average ROCC

Competitors' ROCC

Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)

Total return - 2018 through May 25

Total return - 12 months

Total return - 3 years

Total return - 5 years

Valero Energy Corp.

VLO

12.8%

7.2%

Petroleum Refining

31%

95%

118%

247%

Phillips 66

PSX

12.6%

7.2%

Petroleum Refining

16%

54%

56%

103%

Marathon Petroleum Corp.

MPC

11.8%

7.2%

Petroleum Refining

18%

51%

63%

114%

Andeavor

ANDV

10.9%

7.3%

Petroleum Refining

24%

71%

68%

157%

Exxon Mobil Corp.

XOM

10.5%

6.5%

Petroleum Refining

-4%

0%

2%

2%

HollyFrontier Corp.

HFC

8.7%

7.3%

Petroleum Refining

44%

194%

92%

90%

PBF Energy Inc. Class A

PBF

7.5%

7.3%

Petroleum Refining

28%

128%

85%

87%

Dril-Quip Inc.

DRQ

12.5%

0.6%

Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment

-4%

-9%

-41%

-50%

Oil States International Inc.

OIS

4.8%

0.7%

Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment

24%

22%

-18%

-38%

Newpark Resources Inc.

NR

2.1%

0.9%

Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment

23%

40%

18%

-7%

Baker Hughes, a GE Co. Class A

BHGE

2.0%

-6.6%

Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment

11%

-5%

-18%

16%

National Oilwell Varco Inc.

NOV

1.7%

-0.7%

Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment

15%

27%

-14%

-28%

Rowan Cos. Plc Class A

RDC

3.0%

0.1%

Drilling Oil and Gas Wells

-3%

22%

-35%

-55%

Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc.

DO

1.8%

0.3%

Drilling Oil and Gas Wells

-5%

44%

-45%

-71%

Noble Corp. PLC

NE

1.3%

0.3%

Drilling Oil and Gas Wells

20%

29%

-67%

-82%

Core Laboratories NV

CLB

40.2%

2.6%

Oil and Gas Field Services, NEC

13%

25%

5%

-7%

Oceaneering International Inc.

OII

12.2%

2.5%

Oil and Gas Field Services, NEC

8%

-6%

-54%

-66%

Schlumberger NV

SLB

6.4%

-1.8%

Oil and Gas Field Services, NEC

3%

2%

-19%

3%

Cloud Peak Energy Inc.

CLD

2.9%

1.2%

Bituminous Coal and Lignite Surface Mining

-29%

-10%

-49%

-84%

Matrix Service Co.

MTRX

11.7%

4.4%

Construction - Specisl Trade Contractor

4%

127%

3%

14%

Oasis Petroleum Inc.

OAS

5.8%

3.0%

Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas

44%

17%

-30%

-68%

U.S. Silica Holdings Inc.

SLCA

7.6%

4.9%

Mining, Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)

-5%

-16%

0%

47%

World Fuel Services Corp.

INT

7.8%

3.8%

Wholesale - Petroleum and Petroleum Products (No Bulk Stations)

-25%

-42%

-58%

-47%

Sources: The Shareholder Forum, FactSet

You can click on the tickers for more information about each company, including news, estimates, ratings, charts and financials.

The SIC description for U.S. Silica Holdings SLCA might be a surprise, but the company is included in the energy sector because its largest business segment supplies sand to oil producers that use hydraulic fracturing.

 

Philip

van Doorn

Philip van Doorn covers various investment and industry topics. He has previously worked as a senior analyst at TheStreet.com. He also has experience in community banking and as a credit analyst at the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.

 

Copyright ©2018 MarketWatch, Inc.

 

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.