Shareholder Forum for Options Policies

Forum Home Page

Options Policies Home Page

Program Reference


Chief Executive Magazine, October/November 2007 letter to editor


Issue Date: October/November 2007, Posted On: 10/24/2007

Why Comp Criticism Is Valid

You sometimes get it right and sometimes not. Your article “Is CEO Comp Criticism Valid?” (September 2007) isn’t balanced, starting with the sentence that it is even possible that big company CEOs haven’t been getting the rewards they deserve.

 Any statement that generalizes about a whole group or about the median is lumping too many diverse situations into oversimplifications. If there are excesses or generalizations that bear analysis and discussion, they should deal with the top decile or quartile of very highly paid big company and hedge fund/private equity CEOs. Obviously, most CEOs are not overpaid. If you did so, you would be probably dealing with total annual comps (earned or not earned) in the $25 million to $500 million league, with much of it also tax-sheltered more effectively than for the rest of their employees.

Many of those high payouts do not correlate with truly unusual, sustainable performance and unique leadership, and many are big personal rewards without much big personal, entrepreneurial downside risks having been taken (viz. McKinnell, Grasso, Nardelli, etc.).

Large executive stock options and parachutes are one-way streets that do not align with shareholder risk/rewards because there is no executive downside risk. In fact, if the company doesn’t do well, the executive gets the next traunch at a lower exercise price. If he’s fired for poor outcomes, he will often get an oversize severance reward for his poor outcomes.

You deride the current SEC focus on transparency and perks. What I call gross past distortions (including parachutes, pensions, etc.) came about because of the lack of transparency.

Josh Weston
Honorary Chairman
Roseland, N.J.


Copyright © 2007 Chief Executive - A Magazine for Chief Executive Officer (CEO)




This Forum program is open, free of charge, to all shareholders of the invited corporate participants, and to any fiduciaries or professionals concerned with the investment decisions of those shareholders, according to the posted Conditions of Participation.  The Forum's purpose is to provide shareholders with access to information and a free exchange of views on issues relating to their investment interests described in the Forum Summary As stated in the Conditions, all Forum participants are expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program has been organized with the support of Hermes Equity Ownership Services, Ltd.  It is the first in an expected series that will be managed by a not-for-profit “Institute” to be established for the purpose of continuing the Forum programs conducted by Gary Lutin.

Inquiries and requests to be included in the Forum's distribution list may be addressed to  The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material.

All material on this web site is published by Gary Lutin, who is responsible for conducting the Forum.