Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference


Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings


Forum distribution:

Increasing practice among global investors to develop own analyses of portfolio company management


For the full report summarized in the article below, see

Note: John C. Wilcox, whose observations are reported below, has been a panel member or invited expert in several past Forum programs as Chairman of Morrow Sodali and previously as Senior Vice President and Head of Corporate Governance at TIAA-CREF.


Source: Pensions & Investments, February 11, 2019 article



Institutional investors looking more closely into companies, boards – Morrow Sodali



Getty Images/iStockphoto


Asset owners and managers continue to "dig deeper" into how their portfolio companies are dealing with issues such as ESG, executive pay and activism, and away from compliance checklists, according to Morrow Sodali's Institutional Investor Survey released Monday.

"Shareholders are increasingly interested in looking at companies on the merits rather than just doing a compliance exercise," said John Wilcox, chairman of Morrow Sodali, a global corporate governance firm, in an interview.

The fourth annual survey asked investors with a collective $33 trillion in assets which issues matter most about the companies they hold. The 46 respondents represent senior governance specialists in their organizations, with $19.5 trillion in active investments and $13.5 trillion in passive ones. The survey was a combination of an online survey and one-on-one meetings.

Asked to rank the factors that influence their voting decisions, 93% selected governance policies and practices, followed by long-term business strategy and effective communications. On environmental, social and governance factors, the survey found it is "increasingly being blended into the discussion about what companies are supposed to be doing and how they are judged," Mr. Wilcox said.

On board engagement, 87% of respondents indicated that "proactive and regular engagement" with the board of directors helps them evaluate a company's culture, purpose and reputational risk. That can be good news for the companies because "some investors are willing to give companies greater flexibility to explain policies in terms of their specific business conditions and strategic goals," Morrow Sodali found, even though a deeper dive into companies' strategic decisions increases demands on directors' time and requires greater transparency.

In 2019, the investors said they will increase their focus on board composition and accountability, and press for more disclosure and dialogue around a company's climate-change strategy.

Executive pay also will shift from an investor-specific activity and instead come up more through collective engagement efforts in 2019, the survey found, with 67% of investors ranking compensation as the most important issue in their engagement with other investors.

Asked about activist campaigns, the institutional investors said they are most likely to support one when there is a focus on long-term strategy.

Given the current U.S. political climate toward deregulation, "people are looking to companies now to fill in the gap," Mr. Wilcox said.

Contact Hazel Bradford at ·

© 2019 Crain Communications Inc.


This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.