Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference


Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings


Forum distribution:

Year of opportunity for the professionals managing activist funds and defending their targets


Graphs of 5 year shareholder voting for and against the management of specific U.S. companies are provided by the Shareholder Forum on the following website, based on research from the Proxy Insight affiliate of Activist Insight, the source of research cited in the article below:

Shareholder Support Rankings


Source: Wall Street Journal, December 26, 2018 article


Markets  |  DEALS

Activist Investors Gain Clout as Stocks Tumble

A record of more than 280 companies around the world with market values of more than $500 million were publicly subjected to activist demands in 2018

The billionaire activist investor Carl Icahn, seen here in 2015, publicly targeted nine companies in 2018. PHOTO: VICTOR J. BLUE/BLOOMBERG NEWS


By Cara Lombardo

Dec. 26, 2018 7:00 a.m. ET

Shareholder activists have had their busiest year ever as market declines make companies more affordable and the investors and their tactics become more widely accepted.

A record 284 companies around the world with market values of more than $500 million were publicly subjected to demands from activists between Jan. 1 and Dec. 21, up from 252 in all of 2017, according to data provider Activist Insight. Elliott Management Corp., Carl Icahn and Starboard Value LP were the busiest, with Elliott publicly targeting 24 companies and the other two taking aim at nine each.

As activism spreads internationally, the number of non-U.S. companies attracting campaigns rose to 148 from 125, with the largest year-to-year increase in Asia, the data show.

Activists, who take stakes in companies and push them to make changes to boost their stock prices, benefited from a market that was beset by fears of rising interest rates, slowing economic growth and trade tension. For activists, who tend to make big bets on companies facing challenges, that has created opportunity.

“The market downturn makes some of our clients feel more vulnerable,” said Shaun Mathew, a partner at Kirkland & Ellis LLP who advises companies on how to prepare for and respond to activists. “It’s easier to pick on companies.”


In all, activists and other investors employing their techniques have secured a record 194 board seats so far this year, a nearly 42% increase from 2017, according to Activist Insight. And 64% of those board seats came from settlements negotiated with companies rather than shareholder votes, its data show, which allow both sides to avoid expensive proxy fights.

Trying to capitalize on market declines won’t prove wise if the stocks activists pick keep falling. Activist performance has already been lackluster, trailing the S&P 500 for most of the year, according to HFR Inc.

That hasn’t deterred activists like Mr. Icahn and Elliott, and they weren’t the only threats companies faced in 2018. Former executives, fed-up longtime investors and frustrated heirs showed up at companies including Sharpie maker Newell Brands Inc., review site YelpInc. and Campbell Soup Co. , some with established activists in tow.

Investors of all stripes have been more willing to pressure companies to bend to their will as money flows into passive funds and active stock managers seek any edge they can find.

Monitors display Dell Technologies signage at the New York Stock Exchange. Shareholders pressured the company to sweeten its offer when it returned to the public markets this year. PHOTO: MICHAEL NAGLE/BLOOMBERG NEWS

Dell Technologies Inc. received reams of shareholder feedback after announcing a plan to return to the public markets via the buyout of a publicly traded affiliate—including from some investors who have traditionally avoided confrontation. A public push led by Mr. Icahn and a lawsuit from the billionaire investor helped prompt Dell to negotiate a sweetened bid with several of the shareholders.

Investors are recognizing the benefits of speaking up and doing so early in campaigns, said Bruce Goldfarb, head of Okapi Partners LLC, a proxy-solicitation firm that helps activists and companies communicate with shareholders.

“It’s to their advantage to put their mouth where their money is,” he said.

Directors have come to realize that even companies largely owned by friendly shareholders aren’t immune to activist onslaughts, advisers say.

Despite a slumping stock and repeated strategic missteps, Campbell for years avoided activists, partially because a more than 40% stake owned by heirs to the soup dynasty acted as a deterrent. But in September, Daniel Loeb’s Third Point LLC teamed up with one of the heirs to launch a proxy fight to replace the food maker’s entire board.

Daniel Loeb’s Third Point got two board members on Campbell after it mounted a proxy fight against the soup dynasty. PHOTO: RICHARD B. LEVINE/ZUMA PRESS


The two sides engaged in a heated back-and-forth up until a few days before the shareholder vote, when they struck a settlement adding two Third Point nominees to the board and giving the fund input on another new director and on Campbell’s new chief executive.

Activists themselves are evolving, in many cases by toning down their rhetoric and elevating issues that matter to the shareholders whose support they increasingly need.

Larger activist funds such as ValueAct Capital Partners LP are giving more airtime to environmental, social and governance concerns, which appeal both to their own investors and to index-fund managers who JPMorgan Chase & Co. says control 26% of the S&P 500.

Elliott, long known as one of the most aggressive activists, established an in-house stewardship team that has softened its image and Jana Partners LLC teamed up with the California State Teachers’ Retirement System to lobby Apple Inc. to add screen-time controls. Meanwhile, activists and defense advisers have been competing to hire people with corporate-governance expertise from places like index-fund giant BlackRock Inc.

“Activism has changed in two significant ways: the convergence of active managers behaving more aggressively and activists who are behaving perhaps more benignly,” said Steven Barg, global head of Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s activism-defense practice.

Write to Cara Lombardo at


Copyright ©2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.