Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

The Shareholder Forumtm

support of long term investor interests in

Appraisal Rights

for

Intrinsic Value Realization

Appraisal Rights Home Page

Appraisal Rights Reference

Program Participant Resources

For related issues, see projects:

Dell Inc.

Dole Food Company, Inc.

 

 

RECONSIDERATION OF APPRAISAL RIGHTS

The Delaware Supreme Court issued a ruling on December 14, 2017 that endorsed its interpretation of the "Efficient Market Hypothesis" as a foundation for relying upon market pricing to define a company’s “fair value” in appraisal proceedings. The Forum accordingly reported that it would resume support of marketplace processes instead of judicial appraisal for its participants' realization of intrinsic value in opportunistically priced but carefully negotiated buyouts. See:

December 21, 2017 Forum Report

 Reconsidering Appraisal Rights for Long Term Value Realization

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Funds speculate on appraisal of standalone value in sale to strategic buyer

 

For an explanation of the risks relating to appraisal of a standalone company in a sale that is arguably priced to include value anticipated in a business combination, see

  • September 10, 2013 Forum Report: Court Rules for Appraisal: Fair Value = Intrinsic Value

 

Source: The Wall Street Journal, May 30, 2014 article

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.  |  Business


Business

Three Funds Plan to Seek Appraisal of Zale Shares Over Signet Deal

 

By Liz Hoffman

May 30, 2014 6:01 p.m. ET

Some hedge funds are trying to squeeze money out of stones.

Three funds that voted against or didn't vote in Zale Corp.'s sale to rival ring-retailer Signet Jewelers Ltd. are planning to seek an independent valuation of their shares from a judge, according to people familiar with the matter, taking advantage of an increasingly popular legal process known as appraisal. Together, the funds own about 26% of Zale's shares, according to the people, a stake worth $235 million at the buyout price.

The merger, which will combine two of the largest U.S. jewelry retailers, narrowly passed a shareholder vote on Thursday. About 53% of Zale's outstanding shares voted in favor.

Two of the funds had earlier gone public with their opposition to the sale. TIG Advisors LLC, which owns 9.5%, had been urging shareholders to reject it. Last week, funds controlled by investor Mario Gabelli came out against the deal and said they might seek appraisal for their 7.45% stake. Gabelli may not seek appraisal on all of its shares, one person said.

The third investor is Merion Capital LP, a Pennsylvania-based fund that specializes in appraisal rights. Merion accumulated a 9% stake in Zale in the weeks leading up to the vote, according to a person familiar with the investment.

Merion is one of the largest funds practicing "appraisal arbitrage," an increasingly popular strategy that involves buying up shares of companies on the brink of a buyout, voting against the deal, and then seeking more in court. Including Zale, Merion now has around $770 million tied up in five pending appraisal actions, according to court filings and based on the buyout prices of each. Risks of appraisal include a judge valuing shares below the deal price, and tying up money in the deals, although investors get interest even if they lose.

TIG has said it thinks Zale shares could be worth $28.60 apiece, versus a merger price of $21. It argued that the merger didn't share enough upside with Zale shareholders.

To seek appraisal, a shareholder must vote no or abstain on the deal. It has been pursued in the recent buyouts of Dole Foods Co., BMC Software Inc. and Duff & Phelps Corp.

Write to Liz Hoffman at liz.hoffman@wsj.com

 

Copyright ©2014 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

The program supporting Appraisal Rights Investments was conducted by the Shareholder Forum for invited participants according to stated conditions, including standard Forum policies that each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum and that participant identities and views will not be reported without explicit permission..

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.