Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below


The Shareholder Forum

Returns on Corporate Capital™

—- comparisons of company returns based on GAAP-defined performance measurements —-


produced according to defined methodology and specifications with data provided by

EDGAR Online, a division of Donnelley Financial Solutions,

from SEC records of each subject company’s audited statements




This website is intended only for the use of Forum participants in a private workshop project to define "Returns on Corporate Capital."



To download a printable copy of this definition, click here.

Forum Definition: ROCC Metrics


Methodology and Specifications


Returns on Corporate Capital

(July 5, 2017 workshop version: for review and comment)

The definition of “Returns on Corporate Capital” (“ROCC”) summarized below was developed in a Shareholder Forum workshop project that was initiated in 2016* to address both corporate and investor interests in analyzing a company’s performance based on its use of capital to generate income from the production of goods and services, as the ultimate basis for competitive corporate success and long term shareholder value.

Purpose of consistently defined metric

The standard calculation of ROCC has been developed to provide a broadly applicable measurement of a company’s use of available capital, in essentially the same way that corporate managers and investors commonly measure the merits of a proposed or continuing business enterprise. In this context, the measurements are intended to provide relevant comparisons only among companies with similar industry operations, and for the limited purposes of preliminary review to determine whether more detailed, situation-specific analysis is justified.

The ROCC calculation is similar to some variations of the commonly used “ROIC” (returns on invested capital), but has been carefully defined to provide a consistent metric. By following professional and academic practices to standardize its calculation and specify data elements that can be obtained directly from public sources, ROCC can be used by anyone to compare or test analyses presented by others.

Calculations based on GAAP-defined amounts

The following calculation of ROCC is based strictly on GAAP-defined amounts as they are reported by companies in audited statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), without any researcher “normalization” or other judgmental adjustments:

net income plus interest expense and income taxes,

__divided by__ 

prior year ending balances of

total assets less current liabilities other than interest-bearing debt

Industry competitor aggregates

The ROCC of each company’s industry competitors is based on the same calculations of the total asset and income results for all SEC-reporting companies in the relevant industry other than the subject company, providing an economically meaningful measurement of competitor performance reflecting market contribution rather than an average of unweighted ratios. (It should be noted that the exclusion of the subject company from its industry competitor aggregates, while analytically rigorous, produces different industry competitor results for each company in an industry. ROCC calculations including all companies in an industry can be provided upon request.) The industry of each company is based on the company’s specification of its Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) in its SEC filings; if a 4-digit SIC industry definition is specified by fewer than ten companies, its broader 3 or 2 digit SIC industry group classification is assigned to support statistically meaningful competitor comparisons.

Universe of companies

For purposes of consistency and integrity, the standard ROCC graphs published by the Shareholder Forum provide analyses based on audited statements presented in the Form 10-K annual reports required by the SEC for “public companies.” There were approximately 6,360 such SEC-regulated public companies reporting an aggregate $92 trillion assets for their 2016 fiscal year, and a total of approximately 8,000 SEC-reporting public companies since 2010. Industry aggregates for each year include the asset and income amounts for all companies that reported for that fiscal year.

Special projects can be developed using other companies, such as privately traded or non-U.S. companies, but the data available for these companies may not be reliably comparable.

Source of data

ROCC analyses are produced by the Shareholder Forum using data provided by the EDGAR Online division of Donnelley Financial Solutions from SEC records of each subject company’s reports.


Requests for variations of the standard ROCC reports to address specific analytical requirements are welcomed, and can be addressed to

  July 5, 2017





Permission is granted to republish images of the graphs of Returns on Corporate Capital as presented on this website with their full statements of source and copyright information, or as otherwise specifically approved to satisfactorily describe the analysis and sources, and to respect the intellectual property rights of both the Shareholder Forum and its cited contributors of research.

Information requests and suggestions of research applications for Returns on Corporate Capital or variations of the analysis can be addressed to the Shareholder Forum at


The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material other than as specifically stated. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.