|
Forum Summary
(October 27, 2006)
A “Forum” program is being initiated for shareholders of
companies in relation to which options pricing and similar issues may be
relevant to investors’ capital commitment and voting decisions. Several
companies will be invited to participate, in each case based on
-
the commitment of the board of
directors to an open, cooperative exchange of views among the managers,
investors and professionals concerned with developing economically
practical policies suited to their company’s particular circumstances,
and
-
the apparent significance of
corporate value enhancement to be derived from aligning management
rewards with the achievement of long-term performance objectives.
The intent of the Options Policies
Forum is to facilitate a rational marketplace definition of adaptations
that support a corporate participant’s fair competition for both
management resources and capital. For companies that must respond to
recent discoveries of options backdating or similar reporting
inaccuracies, the Forum objective will be to assure management’s
understanding of investor interests as a foundation for new policies
that may be accepted without adversarial processes. Specifically, if a
corporate participant has received a shareholder proposal for proxy
voting on options policies, such as those initiated in September 2006 by
the Amalgamated Bank LongView Funds providing for the setting of pricing
dates, the proponent shareholder will be encouraged to participate
actively in the Forum’s cooperative process and to consider withdrawal
of the proposal if management satisfactorily resolves investor
interests.
The Forum will first address the
development of general, broadly applicable principles which reflect a
consensus of all key marketplace constituencies. To guide this process,
an Advisory Panel will be formed with representatives of invited
corporate participants, leading investors, and recognized experts. The
process will include opportunities for publicly open exchanges of views,
including an initial meeting to be scheduled in early December, and a
final report will present the Advisory Panel’s conclusions together with
any individual comments offered by its members by March 2007, in time
for reference during that spring’s proxy season.
The Forum will also address
company-specific issues for any corporate participant requesting its own
“workshop.” Each workshop will be organized separately in response to
the particular needs for informal exchanges of views among managers,
investors and professionals interested in the company’s resolution of
issues.
The Forum will be open, free of
charge, to all shareholders of the corporate participants and to any
fiduciaries or professionals concerned with their investment decisions.
As stated in the “Conditions of
Participation” which are publicly posted on the
Forum web site, the Forum will be conducted for the purpose of
providing shareholder participants with access to information and a free
exchange of views on issues relating to their evaluations of
alternatives. All participants – including corporate and professional
as well as investor – are expected to make independent use of
information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of
other participants. It is a Forum rule that participants will not be
identified or quoted without their explicit permission.
This Forum program is organized
with the support of
Hermes Equity Ownership Services, Ltd. It is the first in an
expected series that will be the responsibility of a not-for-profit
“Institute” to be established for the purpose of continuing the Forum
programs conducted by Gary Lutin.
|
| |
|
|
|
Proposed Principles |
|
Common interest
Corporations are organized for the essential
purpose of governing the common interests of investors and
managers in the competitive success of a business enterprise.
Although this purpose can be undermined by short-term financial,
professional or political interests, most investors and managers
will ultimately benefit from the fair sharing of economic risks
and rewards associated with their enterprise. |
Shareholder rights
Grants of management equity participation, whether
in the form of stock options or any other interest that dilutes
shareholder interests in their capital investment, can be
authorized only with the fully informed consent of shareholders.
|
“Guidance” relating to performance
The compensation risks and rewards a company’s
management has accepted are a highly credible indication of the
shareholder value objectives they expect to achieve. Investors
must therefore be able to understand the relevant conditions of
management compensation, and particularly its relation to
performance goals, as a basis for informed capital allocation and
voting decisions. |
|
|
|
News Reports |
|
New York Times
June 22, 2008
"How Big a Payday for the Pay
Consultants?"
♦♦♦
New York Times
May 6, 2008
"Aflac Investors Get a Say on
Executive Pay, a First for a U.S. Company"
and
April 6, 2008
"Say on Pay: A Whisper or a
Shout for Shareholders?"
♦♦♦
Wall Street Journal
March 21, 2008
"(New Math) x (SEC Rules) +
Proxy = Confusion | Firms Disclose Formulas Behind Executive Pay,
Leaving Many Baffled"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
December 7,
2007
Lex: "Board-investor
communication"
see also
Wall Street Journal
January 14,
2008
"Talk Therapy"
♦♦♦
Agenda
November
12, 2007
"U.K. Investors Warn
U.S. About Say on Pay"
♦♦♦
TheCorporateCounsel.net
November 5,
2007
"Verizon's Say on Pay: A
Take-Away"
and
New York Times
November 2, 2007
"Verizon to Put Executive Pay to
Shareholder Vote"
♦♦♦
Investor Relations
Magazine
September 13, 2007
(September 17 update)
"Interest grows in independent shareholder forums"
♦♦♦
New York Times
June
17, 2007
"Hear
Ye, Hear Ye: Corralling Executive Pay"
See also
Crain's New York Business
June 25, 2007
"Executive Pay Report | Slow start for say-on-pay push; Few
shareholder proposals prevail; bull market to blame"
♦♦♦
New York Times
May 26, 2007
EDITORIAL
"A Say on Executive Pay"
♦♦♦
Wall Street Journal
May 26, 2007
"Executive Pay - Next Skirmish Is at
UnitedHealth"
See also Dow Jones Newswires
May 22, 2007
"UnitedHealth Holders Seek More
Say On Governance"
and
May
23, 2007
"Proxy Services
Differ On UnitedHealth; One Nixes Directors"
For voting results, see
St. Paul Pioneer Press
May 30, 2007
"Shareholders warn insurer"
♦♦♦
New York Times
May 19, 2007
"Say-on-Pay Gets Support
at Verizon"
See also
Wall
Street Journal
May 19,
2007
"Verizon
Holders Pass 'Say-on-Pay' Plan"
♦♦♦
New York Times
May 4, 2007
"Verizon Vote on Pay Levels to Be
Decided in a Recount"
See other May 4, 2007reports:
Financial Times
Wall
Street Journal
Washington Post
See also
Fortune (The Browser)
April 27, 2007
"Proxy showdown: Verizon
vs. retirees"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
April 20, 2007
"Hermes to push for vote
on pay at UnitedHealth"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
April 1, 2007
"Why America’s boards face
awkward times in the auditorium"
♦♦♦
Compliance Week
February 13, 2007
"Activists Have
Sudden Outbreak Of Dialogue"
♦♦♦
New York Times
January 21, 2007
"Roadblocks to Greater Say on
Pay"
Subsequent New York
Times reports:
March
6, 2007
"AT&T Investors Will Have Their Say"
and
March 23, 2007
"For AT&T’s
Chief, a 94% Increase in Pay"
♦♦♦
Global Proxy
Watch
January 19, 2007
"Watershed"
♦♦♦
New York Times
December 17, 2006
"A Sneak Preview of Proxy
Battles"
♦♦♦
Global
Proxy Watch
November 3, 2006
"Right Option"
♦♦♦
Financial
Times
October 30, 2006
"Activist investors to probe
backdating"
|
|
Related
Issues
|
|
See articles relating
to:
Advisory Voting
Compensation Issues
Global Practices
History of Options
Practices
Information Requirements
Options Backdating
Regulatory Process
Recent
General
Relevance
Fortune
June 26,
2008
"Who's
watching the watchdogs?"
"A new study from Stanford University
questions the reliability of corporate-governance ratings"
♦♦♦
Wall Street
Journal
June 2, 2008
"Turning the
Tables:
RiskMetrics's
Head Faces His Day
of Shareholder
Judgment"
♦♦♦
Wall Street
Journal
March 28, 2008
"Do Stock
Options Turn You Into A Bad Person?"
♦♦♦
Financial
Times
March 26, 2008
FT REPORT -
CORPORATE FINANCE 2008: FRONT PAGE
"Gentlemen,
please empty your pockets"
and
"Aflac
shareholders vote on executive pay"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
March 8, 2008
"Wanted: ideas to head off a
regulatory backlash"
and
New
York Times
March 7,
2008
"Panel to
Review Payouts Given by Troubled Firms"
See also
Wall Street Journal
March 8, 2008
"CEO Apologizes, but
Not for Lender"
♦♦♦
Wall
Street Journal
March 7,
2008
"Say on
the Boss's Pay | Aflac CEO Amos Bets on His Track Record as Insurer
Becomes First U.S. Company to Hold Vote on Executive Compensation"
♦♦♦
Wall
Street Journal
February
27, 2008
"'Say on
Pay' Gets a Push, But Will Boards Listen?"
♦♦♦
Investor Relations Magazine
February 2008
"The hunt is on"
♦♦♦
New York Times
December 9,
2007
"Sharper Claws for
Recovering Executive Pay"
see also
Wall Street Journal
December 10, 2007
"Conflict Concerns Benefit Independent Pay Advisers"
♦♦♦
New York Times
December 6,
2007
"House Panel Finds
Conflicts in Executive Pay Consulting"
♦♦♦
Financial
Week
October
22, 2007
"Say-on-pay
critics warn of problems | Proposed law could mean lawsuits galore, plus
additional legislation, Oxley says"
♦♦♦
New York Times
October 13,
2007
"Pfizer’s Attempt at
Financial Clarity Gets Blurred"
see also
New York Times
October 10,
2007
"S.E.C. Finds Fault on
Pay Disclosures"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
October 7, 2007
"Disparity
‘sign of corporate malaise’"
see also
Financial Times
October 14, 2007
"We are overpaid, say US executives"
♦♦♦
Wall Street Journal
August 31,
2007
"SEC Asks Firms to
Detail Top Executives' Pay"
See also
Financial Times
September 4, 2007
"SEC's red-letter day for top pay miscreants"
and responding
Financial Times
September 7, 2007
"Providing a window into US exec compensation"
♦♦♦
ISS Corporate
Governance Blog
August 2, 2007
"Analysis: Forces
Fueling Engagement to Grow in 2008"
♦♦♦
Associated Press
July 18, 2007
"Pay Proposal Advocates
Get New Allies"
♦♦♦
Wall Street Journal
July 16, 2007
"Firms, Investors
Trying More Talk, Less Acrimony"
♦♦♦
CFO Magazine
July 1, 2007
"Drowning in Data"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
June 27, 2007
"Call to cut quarterly
guidance"
See also
Bloomberg
June 28, 2007
"Pfizer Will Start Meetings With Largest Investors"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
June 15, 2007
"Fund group
offers say on executive pay"
♦♦♦
Forbes
June 4,
2007
"Stock Option
Swings"
♦♦♦
New York Times
May 25, 2007
"More Than Ever, It
Pays to Be the Top Executive"
♦♦♦
San Jose
Mercury News
May 11,
2007
"Apple
stock owners give CEO Jobs a slicing | Reform Proposals Get Strong
Support"
♦♦♦
New York Times
May 11, 2007
"Panel to Look at
Conflicts in Consulting"
See also
Wall Street Journal
May 14, 2007
"Boards
Aim to Avoid Conflicts | Safeguards Are Imposed On Same Pay Consultant For
Executives, Directors"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
May 3, 2007
"America frets
about executive pay"
♦♦♦
TheStreet.com
May 1,
2007
"Pay-Fight
Foes Blow Hot Air"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
April 30, 2007
"'Legal vicious
circle' emerges"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
April 21, 2007
"Obama joins push on
executive pay awards"
♦♦♦
Washington Post
April 11,
2007
"Morgan Stanley,
Bank of N.Y. Investors Reject 'Say on Pay' | Activist Shareholders Encouraged
by Vote Totals"
♦♦♦
New York Times
April 8, 2007
"Special
Report: More Pieces. Still a Puzzle."
See also accompanying
"Transparency, Lost in the Fog"
and
"More Nuggets
on Pay From Proxy Filings"
♦♦♦
Dow Jones
Newswires
April 2,
2007
"Most Investment
Pros Support Shareholder Vote On Pay - Survey"
♦♦♦
New York Times
March 31, 2007
"Intel Can Recover
Bonuses It Shouldn’t Have Paid"
♦♦♦
Wall Street Journal
March 21, 2007
Review &
Outlook
"CEOs and Their
Millions"
♦♦♦
New York Times
March 11, 2007
"Weird and Weirder
Numbers on Pay Reports"
See
also
Los Angeles Times
March 16, 2007
"Sempra
CEO's pay in fine print | The firm's disclosures on compensation lack clarity
despite new rules to boost transparency"
and
Associated Press
(as published by Forbes)
March 30, 2007
"Proxies
Fall Short on Pay"
♦♦♦
New York Times
March 6, 2007
"AT&T Investors Will
Have Their Say"
and
Financial Times
March 7, 2007
"AT&T forced to allow
pay vote"
♦♦♦
Forbes
March 1,
2007
"CEOs Beware:
Congress At Work" ♦♦♦
Associated Press (as published by Forbes)
February
27, 2007
"Q&A: Upside to
Executive Pay Votes" ♦♦♦
Wall Street Journal
February 26,
2007
"Shareholders Push For
Vote on Executive Pay" ♦♦♦
Financial Times
February 26,
2007
"Whatever next:
the US eyes up European models" ♦♦♦
Associated Press (as published by Forbes)
February 20, 2007
"Frank: Exec Pay
Legislation Coming Soon" ♦♦♦
Washington Post
February
15, 2007
"Score One for
Dissent | Aflac to Be 1st U.S. Firm to Allow Advisory Votes on Pay"
and
Financial
Times
February 14, 2007
"Aflac investors get say
in executive pay"
See also
New York Times
February 18, 2007
"Democracy in Action" ♦♦♦
Associated
Press (as published by Forbes)
February 9, 2007
"Is This Year to
Burst CEO Pay Balloon?"
♦♦♦
Global Proxy Watch
February 9, 2007
"Say
on Pay"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
February 8, 2007
"Blue chips in
talks on UK-style pay vote"
See also
January 26, 2007
"Push to curb
executive pay"
♦♦♦
New York Times
January 7, 2007
"More $200
Million Parachutes? Don’t Be Shocked"
♦♦♦
Financial Times
January 5, 2007
"It pays to
simplify boardroom compensation"
♦♦♦
New York
Times
December 29,
2006
"Does S.E.C.
Know What It Is Doing?"
♦♦♦
Wall Street
Journal
December 28, 2006
"SEC Reversal
Irks a Committee Chief | Rep. Frank Shows Concern For Relaxed Disclosure
Rule, Vows to Get Congress Involved"
See similar
reports in
BusinessWeek
Financial Times
Washington Post
♦♦♦
New York Times
December 27, 2006
"S.E.C. Changes Reporting Rule
on Bosses’ Pay"
♦♦♦
Wall Street Journal
December 27, 2006
"Open Spigot | Bosses'
Pay: How Stock Options Became Part of the Problem Once Seen as a Reform,
They Grew Into Font of Riches And System to Be Gamed | Reload, Reprice,
Backdate"
Dedicated
News Coverage
New York
Times
(link to NYTimes.com web site - registration required)
Executive
Pay: A Special Report
(2006-2007)
and
Times Topics: Executive Pay
(2007-2008)
Wall
Street Journal
(links to
WSJ.com web site - subscription required)
Perfect Payday
&
Options Scorecard
also
CEO Compensation Scorecard
(2007) |
|
|