The Shareholder ForumTM

Electronic Participation in Shareholder Meetings

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

"E-Meetings" Home Page

"E-Meetings" Program Reference


IR Magazine | Inside Investor Relations, October 14, 2011 article


Inside Investor Relations


ISS warns of follow-up activism over executive pay

Tim Human 14 Oct 2011

End-of-season roundup offers advice on which companies are most likely to be targeted next year

US companies that received more than 30 percent opposition to their pay proposals are likely to face heightened scrutiny during the 2012 proxy season, warns Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) in its post-season report.

Shareholders have indicated that they expect to see ‘explicit action’ from management once this threshold is crossed, writes the proxy adviser.

ISS data show 164 companies – or roughly 6 percent – out of the Russell 3000 Index experienced more than 30 percent opposition to their pay proposals and therefore are at higher risk.

‘If… companies don’t adequately respond to this year’s say-on-pay votes, investors may ramp up their protests, withhold support from more compensation committee members in 2012 and vote ‘no’ during the advisory vote,’ states ISS.

Changing their ways

The proxy adviser highlights two examples of companies that have made significant revisions to executive compensation and seen shareholder support rebound.

Occidental Petroleum and KeyCorp both failed pay votes in 2010, but this year won 91.3 percent and 86.7 percent support, respectively, after making ‘substantive changes,’ explains ISS.

‘Occidental… cut the CEO’s long-term incentive opportunities by 70 percent, expanded the peer group used to benchmark pay, and reduced award opportunities for other named executives,’ notes the report.

Broad support for management

The warning comes in ISS’ final roundup of the 2011 US proxy season, which for the first time saw all US companies face an advisory vote on pay.

Overall, shareholders displayed strong support for management’s pay proposals. The report finds that, on average, investors offer 92.1 percent support in these votes.

As of September 1, just 38 companies in the Russell 3000 Index had been defeated in say-on-pay votes.

Download the full 2011 US Post-Season Report.


© Copyright Cross Border Ltd. 1995–2011.




This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of standards for conducting shareholder meetings with electronic participation. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

The organization of this Forum program was encouraged by Walden Asset Management, and is proceeding with the invited leadership support of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Intel Corporation to address issues relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.