The Shareholder ForumTM

Electronic Participation in Shareholder Meetings

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

"E-Meetings" Home Page

"E-Meetings" Program Reference


Note: Intel Corporation has been a Leadership Supporter of the Forum's recent public interest programs for “Say on Pay” and “E-Meetings,” and was represented on the panels guiding both of those programs.


Corporate Secretary, September 13, 2011 article


Corporate Secretary


Five questions with Intel's senior counsel

by Aarti Maharaj    | 13 Sep 2011

Irving Gomez, assistant secretary and senior counsel for securities and corporate governance, Intel Corporation.

Description: Intel

Irving Gomez is responsible for Intel’s corporate-level legal activities, including securities filings with the SEC and providing advice and counsel to the board and the corporate governance team. Last year he won the Corporate Secretary Rising Star Award. He recently chatted with deputy editor Aarti Maharaj about his experiences as a senior attorney at Intel.

1. How does working at Intel make you a leader in corporate governance reform?

Intel was an early adopter of majority voting and voluntarily adopted say on pay before it was required under the Dodd-Frank Act. The company has developed a tradition of thought leadership on corporate governance issues, such as adding a new CEO succession section to the proxy statement and expanding on the risk assessment. With that in mind, working at Intel, you have to live up to the standards set by your predecessors and our corporate secretary, Cary Klafter. I need to be on top of all the hot topics in the corporate governance area and send in comment letters to the SEC on topics that we have valuable input on.
2. As the recipient of our rising star award, what would you say is the greatest challenge for governance professionals?

Being honored by Corporate Secretary and my peer group was a true highlight in my career – now my biggest challenge is trying to live up to these expectations and staying relevant. I take my cue from past award winners and I see that they are constantly trying to do better, not only for their companies, but also for the corporate governance area in general.
3. One of your current roles includes heading up the team responsible for writing Intel’s proxy statement. What do you do that might be different from other companies?

Not knowing specifically what other companies do, I can say there are companies I admire and also look at because they, like us, start the proxy process fairly early on – I start with the proxy kickoff in September or October, yet we do not send out our proxy until the end of March or beginning of April. In addition, the board as a whole actively sees each draft and sends its comments.
4. Intel was one of the first companies to make an affirmative statement regarding its conclusion relating to risk analysis. What role did you play in implementing this company-wide program?  

My role in this process is to define what we are looking for, as I am an interpreter of regulations. We thought it prudent to explain our definition of risk. Before the SEC broadened the scope of a company’s risk assessment, we took a hard look at all our compensation programs throughout the company, and implemented changes we felt were prudent.  
5. Two years since the launch of your virtual annual meeting and live online voting platform, how successful has it been?

The virtual meeting is where we attempt to replicate the live experience of the annual meeting. Stockholders are allowed to watch the proceedings, post questions and tender their votes. The other aspect is the stockholder forum, where we open up the site the same day we start mailing the proxy materials. The forum allows stockholders to ask pre-meeting questions and, since inception, the number of questions has grown from 24 in 2009 to 170 in 2011.


© Copyright Cross Border Ltd. 1995–2011.




This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of standards for conducting shareholder meetings with electronic participation. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

The organization of this Forum program was encouraged by Walden Asset Management, and is proceeding with the invited leadership support of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Intel Corporation to address issues relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.