Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Inviting further comments on academic analysis of index fund influence

 

For the currently revised version of the paper referenced in the article below, see

The earlier working draft of this paper was presented for review by Forum participants in November 2018, here.

Note: One of the authors of the article below, Lucian A. Bebchuk, has been an invited expert in several Forum programs since 2000.

 

Source: The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, November 4, 2019 posting

Index Funds and the Future of Corporate Governance: Replying to Critics

Posted by Lucian Bebchuk (Harvard Law School) and Scott Hirst (Boston University), on Monday, November 4, 2019

Editor’s Note: Lucian Bebchuk is the James Barr Ames Professor of Law, Economics, and Finance, and Director of the Program on Corporate Governance, at Harvard Law School. Scott Hirst is Associate Professor at Boston University School of Law and Director of Institutional Investor Research at the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance.

This post is based on their study (discussed on the Forum here). Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Agency Problems of Institutional Investors by Lucian Bebchuk, Alma Cohen, and Scott Hirst (discussed on the Forum here); and The Specter of the Giant Three by Lucian Bebchuk and Scott Hirst (discussed on the Forum here).

We recently placed on SSRN a revised and expanded version of our forthcoming article, Index Funds and the Future of Corporate Governance: Theory, Evidence and Policy, which will be published in the December issue of the Columbia Law Review. The article puts forward a comprehensive theoretical, empirical and policy analysis of index fund stewardship.

Our article has been in circulation for the last year, and we have been fortunate to receive reactions and responses to our work from many academics, both in their writings and in various fora in which earlier versions of this article were presented, as well as from practitioners. Our revision attempts to engage in detail with the arguments of a wide range of commentators taking a different view on index fund stewardship.

Among the academic works taking such a different view with which we engage are studies by Ian Appel, Todd Gormley & Donald Keim; John Coates; Asaf Eckstein; Einer Elhauge; Jill Fisch, Assaf Hamdani & Steven Davidoff Solomon; Ron Gilson & Jeff Gordon; Caleb Griffin; Sean Griffith; Marcel Kahan & Ed Rock; Dorothy Shapiro Lund; Patrick Jahnke; Jonathan Lewellen & Katharina Lewellen; Alexander Platt; and Eric Posner, Fiona Scott Morton & Glen Weyl.

Among the practitioners with whose reactions or arguments we engage are officers of the “Big Three,” BlackRock, State Street Governance Advisors, and Vanguard,

We continue to work on these issues, and comments and reactions from readers would be most welcome.

The revised version of our article is available here.

 

 

Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
All copyright and trademarks in content on this site are owned by their respective owners. Other content © 2019 The President and Fellows of Harvard College.

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.