Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

investor rights to intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also 2011-2019 analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Leader of old "block or bribe" defense playbook now supports long term shareholder interests

 

For the full statements of both views summarized in the brief article below, see

For another recent statement of the author's revised views, see

 

Source: The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, May 6, 2019 posting

Coordinating Governance and Stewardship Between Institutional Investors and Asset Managers

Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Monday, May 6, 2019

Editor’s Note: Martin Lipton is a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and matters affecting corporate policy and strategy. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton memorandum by Mr. Lipton.

The decision by Vanguard to grant proxy voting responsibilities to the external managers of certain Vanguard funds is a road map for the stewardship and proxy voting relationship between institutional investors, such as pension funds and endowments, and the external asset managers they employ. In announcing its decision, Vanguard said:

We believe proxy voting is a great way to integrate investment stewardship responsibilities with investment management practices. Our external managers are well-positioned to take on proxy voting responsibilities in a manner that supports shareholder value creation over the long term.

Vanguard noted that it was not abdicating its stewardship and proxy voting responsibilities. Each of the asset managers has proxy voting guidelines and policies that the manager (and Vanguard) “believes will maximize the long-term value of the companies it invests in on behalf of the Vanguard fund.”

The Vanguard announcement goes on to say:

Although each external management firm follows its own policies and guidelines that govern proxy voting decisions, Vanguard has carefully selected managers whose principles and processes align with the objectives of the funds they manage.

In addition to evaluating each external manager on their investment strategies, Vanguard reviews their voting capabilities and is confident in their ability to discharge their voting responsibilities consistent with their fiduciary duty to the Vanguard funds.

The manner in which Vanguard is transferring stewardship and proxy voting to external asset managers is applicable to all institutional investors, including those subject to ERISA regulations and those subject to ordinary trust law standards. Institutional investors who believe that sustainable long-term investment strategies and environmental and social policies designed to enhance relationships with employees, customers, suppliers and communities will create long-term shareholder value, can delegate to, and insist that, their asset managers follow those policies in engaging with, and exercising their stewardship responsibilities with, the companies in which they invest.

As a final note, it is worth pointing out that this is consistent with the stewardship principles of the current edition of The New Paradigm, see It’s Time To Adopt The New Paradigm.

 

Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
All copyright and trademarks in content on this site are owned by their respective owners. Other content © 2019 The President and Fellows of Harvard College.

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.