Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Regulator questions executive explanations of buyback benefits to their corporation when they sell their own shares

 

 For the subsequently delivered speech anticipated in the article below, see

Additional reports and research addressing the use of corporate capital to repurchase stock can be found in the "Stock Buyback Policy" reference section of a Forum project that had addressed a company-specific example, and in the user-input models developed in a recent Forum workshop for Buyback Analysis.

 

Source: Wall Street Journal, June 10, 2018 article

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.


Markets

Insiders Pocket Gains on Buybacks, Vexing Regulator

SEC Commissioner Jackson says executives are taking advantage of loopholes; calls for review to change regulatory rules

 

The recent surge in buybacks follows changes to the tax law that made them more attractive for companies and executives have been selling significantly more of their stock immediately after the news. Bloomin’ Brands Inc., the operator of casual-dining spots including Outback Steakhouse, illustrates the trend. PHOTO: SCOTT KEELER/ZUMA PRESS

 

By Gretchen Morgenson and Tom McGinty

June 10, 2018 12:00 p.m. ET

Corporate insiders are personally capitalizing on the recent boom in buyback announcements, vexing a top regulatory official.

Taking advantage of price bumps that often accompany share-repurchase announcements, company executives have been selling significantly more of their stock immediately after the news than they do beforehand, according to an analysis by Robert J. Jackson, Jr., a commissioner at the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In a speech on Monday, Mr. Jackson—appointed by President Donald Trump and sworn in this year to fill a Democratic seat at the SEC—will urge regulators to review securities laws that provide protection to insiders making such trades.

Insiders who sell stock into buyout bounces aren’t trading illegally, of course, and Mr. Jackson isn’t accusing them of that. And other investors also have the opportunity to take advantage of the bumps. But these price surges can be especially beneficial to corporate executives holding large chunks of corporate stock looking for an uptick to unload shares.

“The SEC gives an exemption from market-manipulation rules to companies doing a buyback,” Mr. Jackson said in an interview. “The SEC shouldn’t be making it easier for executives to use them to cash out.”

Mr. Jackson, a former law professor, examined stock trades at 385 companies that announced buybacks in 2017 through this year’s first quarter. He found the percentage of insiders selling shares more than doubled immediately following their companies’ buyback announcements as many of the stocks popped.

 

 

Daily stock sales by the insiders rose from an average of $100,000 before the buyback announcements to $500,000 after them. The sellers received proceeds totaling $75 million more than had they sold before the announcement, the study concluded. At 32% of the companies, at least one insider sold in the first 10 days after the buyback announcement.

As is customary among SEC commissioners, Mr. Jackson is careful to note that his views are his own and don’t reflect those of the entire agency. The SEC didn’t return an email seeking comment.

What’s clear is that such corporate share-repurchase programs have grown increasingly popular among companies. So far this year, buyback announcements from all U.S. publicly traded companies totaled just over $500 billion, according to data from Birinyi Associates Inc. For all of last year, companies announced $685 billion in buybacks up from $670 billion in 2016.

The recent activity follows changes to the tax law that made buybacks more attractive for companies. Many investors welcome the deals because they often boost a stock’s price, but some consider them a dubious use of corporate capital if they are made at high valuations or if the returns from buybacks don’t exceed an investment in the business.

Stock repurchases can make a company’s earnings per share appear better by reducing its number of shares outstanding. Buybacks can also bolster executive pay at companies using benchmarks based on earnings-per-share increases.

Mr. Jackson’s study didn’t identify specific companies. But Bloomin’ Brands Inc., the operator of casual-dining spots including Outback Steakhouse, illustrates the trend. Before the market opened Feb. 22, the company announced its earnings and noted the existence of a new $150 million stock-repurchase program.

On that day and on Feb. 26, Chief Technology Officer Donagh Herlihy sold a combined 216,562 shares, generating roughly $1.4 million in net proceeds, regulatory filings show.

On March 2, six days after the news, Chief Legal Officer Joseph Kadow sold roughly 281,000 shares generating $5.07 million, according to the filings. Also that day, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Elizabeth Smith sold 150,000 shares generating $2.5 million, filings indicate.

The sales were executed at prices that were, on average, 7% higher than the closing price the day before the buyback was announced. The three executives declined to comment on the sales but a Bloomin’ Brands spokeswoman said in a statement: “We have had share buyback programs in place continually since December 2014 and in similar or larger amounts.”

In the interview, Mr. Jackson said the SEC hasn’t looked at buyback rules for more than a decade. With the recent surge in such activity, he said, “it’s time to take another look at these rules.”

At issue is Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which advises companies how to proceed with buyback timing and other mechanics, such as prices paid and volume restrictions. It also provides a “safe harbor” for officers or directors to trade in the shares during a repurchase without running afoul of antifraud provisions of the securities laws.

Mr. Jackson believes that executives who sell into buybacks are benefiting at the expense of shareholders. “If an executive believes a buyback is the right thing for the long term, they should put their money where their mouth is and keep their stockholdings,” he said.

The study also found that in the days leading up to share repurchase announcements, the companies’ stocks underperformed the broader market by an average of 1.4%. During the 30 days after the announcement, the companies’ stocks outperformed the overall market by an average of 2.5%.

Mr. Jackson is scheduled to present his analysis Monday at the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning think tank in Washington. The study parallels his past academic work on corporate governance issues. He taught law at NYU and Columbia and was founding director of the Columbia Law School’s Data Lab, which used technology to study the reliability of company disclosures.

Write to Gretchen Morgenson at gretchen.morgenson@wsj.com and Tom McGinty at tom.mcginty@wsj.com

Appeared in the June 11, 2018, print edition as 'Insiders Make Hay On Rising Buybacks.'

 

 

Copyright ©2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.