Bloomberg, May 30, 2018 article and video: "Besieged by Activist Investors? Goldman Now Has an App for That" [Trends in investment banking competition for activist defense engagements]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

investor rights to intrinsic value realization


Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also 2011-2019 analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings




Forum distribution:

Trends in investment banking competition for activist defense engagements


Source: Bloomberg, May 30, 2018 article and video




Besieged by Activist Investors? Goldman Now Has an App for That

By Sonali Basak

‎May‎ ‎30‎, ‎2018‎ ‎7‎:‎00‎ ‎AM


Software gauges risk that raiders will target a public company

It’s part of a push to automate some investment bank functions


Morgan Stanley, Goldman Using Tech to Give Clients an Edge

It used to take Goldman Sachs Group Inc. bankers days to analyze a company’s vulnerability to activist investors. Now, the firm is launching an app that lets clients do it themselves in seconds.

Goldman Sachs has spent two years quietly developing “Jupiter,” a program that sifts historical data on a company’s shareholders, then combines that with other information to rate its vulnerability to activists. The firm will offer the app in coming weeks to clients that could become targets of corporate raiders.

The software gauges the risk of an activist attack in several ways. It sifts, for example, funds that own a company’s stock, showing how it ranks alongside other holdings. The idea is that a fund manager is more likely to reject an activist’s demands if the company already looks good in the portfolio -- say, growing revenue faster or paying a higher dividend than other bets. Executives can use that information to ensure they don’t fall behind, or they can try to court more investors.

Steven Barg  Source: Goldman Sachs



“The best defense for activism is a good offense,” said Steven Barg, a Goldman partner who co-leads merger-and-acquisitions solutions. “It’s having the highest possible stock price and a roster of investors that believe in your stock.”

Activism defense is a growing practice on Wall Street. Last year, investors spent record sums trying to shake up corporate boards and agitating for other changes, according to Lazard Ltd. At target companies, the incursions are known to upend long-term strategies, oust company leaders and curtail expansion efforts to instead boost payouts to shareholders.

Goldman has been pouring money into technology to simplify tasks such as underwriting stock offerings -- eliminating thousands of hours of work previously done by humans. Through Jupiter, dealmakers can create presentations in a fraction of the time it used to, according to Barg. And customers will be able to explore the data themselves.

The app, which works on mobile phones and desktop computers, was developed by a team of investment bankers and data scientists, including Barg and Richard Rivero, a managing director who leads what the firm’s investment-banking division calls its “strats” effort.

Discovering Correlations

In addition to helping clients analyze and profile their current shareholders, Goldman’s app also identifies potential investors. Companies can see how they rank in fund portfolios by almost two dozen metrics, including return on equity and dividend yield.

It also blends data to create a simple, proprietary score for a company’s vulnerability to corporate raiders, expressed as a percentage. The number is fluid, changing as new data arrives. As of Friday, a company scoring 76 percent for a year or more was deemed three times more likely to be targeted by an activist, Barg said.

Some of the key inputs are fairly obvious, such as the total return on a company’s stock. But backtesting also showed the importance of other data, such as dispersion of analyst rankings. When analysts can’t agree on whether to buy or sell a stock, it may mean management needs to do a better job explaining their strategy -- or risk attracting activists.

“If your shareholders know who you are and own you for the right reasons, they’ll continue to hold you, and hold you dearly,” Barg said.


©2018 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved 



This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.