Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum reference:

The Conference Board endorses "virtual only" shareholder meetings, dismisses opposition of institutional investors

 

For the views of institutional investors addressed by the Executive Director of The Conference Board Governance Center in his interview below, see

  • October 2017, Council of Institutional Investors: "Build a Better Meeting" (4 pages, 386 KB, in PDF format)  [Recommendations to assure fair access and effective engagement in shareholder meetings, discouraging "a virtual-only format that falls far short of an in-person experience" and concluding that it is "incumbent on companies to push back when vendors market 'virtual meeting solutions' that undermine the quality of the meeting for shareholders"]

Issues concerning "virtual-only" shareholder meetings had been addressed in the Forum's 2010 public program to establish marketplace standards for "Electronic Participation in Shareholder Meetings."

 

Source: Boardroom Resources, February 20, 2018 video interview

Boardroom Resources

Virtual-Only Shareholder Meetings: The Good, Bad & Ugly

Episode Summary

Each year, we see more companies electing to hold virtual-only shareholder meetings, for which the benefits are clear: (1) it’s easier to coordinate; (2) it’s less expensive; and (3) most annual meetings don’t amount to much. However, the disadvantages of virtual-only meetings loom large for certain investors.

A few active investors and pension funds like the NYC Comptroller’s Office have spoken out against the practice, claiming that virtual-only meetings “deprive shareowners of important rights” and “stifle criticism”. Additionally, the Council of Institutional Investors (CII) has taken the stance that virtual meetings should be used only as a supplement to traditional in-person meetings, not a substitute.

This episode of Inside America’s Boardrooms is broadcast from our new studio location at The Conference Board in New York City. We welcome back Doug Chia, Executive Director of The Conference Board Governance Center, to debate the pros and cons of virtual-only shareholder meetings—and to predict what actions investors may take against the practice.

}

I think everybody would agree that most corporations and executives are trying to do the right thing—they’re trying to run their business for the benefit of the stakeholders…The problem is the bad actors are the ones that get most of the attention and really create the mistrust of corporate America that we’ve seen building over the years.

— Doug Chia, Executive Director, The Conference Board Governance Center

Host TK Kerstetter and Chia discuss current trends in virtual shareholder meetings and explain what advantages and disadvantages boards should consider as they assess whether virtual-only meetings are suitable for their shareholders.

 

©2017 Boardroom Resources LLC.

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.