WALL STREET JOURNAL.
The Intelligent Investor
Meet an Intrepid Stock-Market Sleuth. He Just Turned 19 Years Old
What happens when a
college freshman digs very deep into a company’s finances
Aaron Chow, a freshman at the
University of California, Berkeley, was bitten by the investment
bug at age 13. PHOTO: ERIC KAYNE FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Retiree Tom Miller was
recently talking with his friend Aaron Chow about an investment Mr.
Miller had made in Rich Uncles Real Estate Investment Trust I,
a property fund whose
shares don’t trade publicly.
Yes, it’s called “Rich Uncles.”
Mr. Chow studied its website, read every page of every regulatory
document the company had filed, researched its accounting practices and peppered
its investor-relations staff with phone calls. By the time he was done, even the
REIT’s chief executive knew who he was.
A month ago, Mr. Chow turned 19 years old.
His story — and his approach — show that even in a market
dominated by fast-trading computers and by index funds that do no research on
their holdings, intrepid individual investors can still distinguish themselves
with diligent research.
Mr. Chow, now a freshman majoring in economics at the University
of California, Berkeley, is curious, skeptical and relentless in the pursuit of
information that others may have overlooked.
Benjamin Graham, mentor to Warren Buffett, defined two basic
types of investors in his classic book “The Intelligent Investor”: defensive and
TOP: Aaron Chow, left, speaks
with his dorm roommates Siddharth Karia and Kaushal Partani.
BOTTOM: Mr. Chow speaks on the
phone. Photo: Eric Kayne for The Wall Street Journal.
PHOTO: ERIC KAYNE FOR THE WALL
The defensive investor, wrote Graham, seeks “freedom from effort,
annoyance and the need for making frequent decisions,” while avoiding “serious
mistakes or losses.”
The enterprising investor is willing to “devote time and care to
the selection of securities that are both sound and more attractive than the
average.” Over long periods, Graham added, the enterprising investor should earn
“a better average return than that realized by the passive investor.”
Mr. Chow was bitten by the investment bug at age 13, when he
picked up a copy of The Wall Street Journal while waiting to board a flight with
his family. He soon borrowed Graham’s book from the library and tried finding
bargains among low-priced “penny stocks.”
Before long he had burned through most of the $2,000 his parents,
a biotechnology consultant and an accountant, had given him. On the verge of
tears, he exclaimed to his father, “I’m not going to lose any more money!”
While other teenagers were playing “Minecraft” and “Grand Theft
Auto,” Mr. Chow was reading Graham’s masterwork, “Security Analysis,” and
teaching himself how to read companies’ financial reports.
“Business is fascinating,” he says. “Investing is just a way to
own a stake in businesses that generate cash by producing the things you see
around you in people’s daily lives.”
When he scoured Rich Uncles’ website, Mr. Chow saw large type
proclaiming its fees at “0%,” although a pop-up, fine-print disclosure mentions
In fact, the fund
charges an offering fee of approximately 3%, along with 2% on each purchase of
property, 3% on each sale and a 0.6% annual management fee. Total fees, as a
percentage of the company’s net worth, exceeded 1.8% in 2016, the latest year
for which results are available. (Unlike mutual funds, private REITs generally
don’t express their expenses as a percentage of per-share value.)
Mr. Chow spotted a reference in a filing to a “fact-finding
inquiry” by the SEC “related to the advertising and sale of securities by the
He even questioned a highly technical detail: how Rich Uncles
a 2016 rule from
the Financial Accounting Standards Board on reporting cash flows. He contends
that the way the company changed its reporting makes its business look more
robust and its dividend safer.
The accounting change does seem to have had the effect of making
Rich Uncles’ operating and free cash flows appear larger, says Howard Schilit,
founder of Schilit Forensics, an accounting-analysis firm in New York.
John Davis, chief financial officer at Rich Uncles, says the
change had no impact on the REIT’s cash or net income. The REIT, one of several
from the Costa Mesa, Calif.-based firm, launched in 2012 and holds about $130
million in commercial real estate.
Finally, Mr. Chow noticed that Rich Uncles hadn’t filed a report
to disclose that its independent auditor, Anton & Chia, was
charged with civil fraud by the SEC in December.
“We respectfully disagree with the [SEC] proceeding against our
firm,” says Gregory Wahl, founder and managing partner of Anton & Chia. “We’re
committed to litigating and getting due process.”
Harold Hofer, chief executive of Rich Uncles, says it will soon
file a disclosure relating to Anton & Chia and will do “whatever our legal
counsel advises us to do.” Securities attorneys say such a disclosure is
He says Rich Uncles voluntarily disclosed — and is cooperating
with — the SEC’s non-public investigation of its marketing practices, which
isn’t an allegation of wrongdoing.
The company pays quarterly dividends at a 7.5% annual rate;
however, there is no public market for its shares, and Rich Uncles warns that it
could need to sell properties in order to buy back shares from investors.
The marketing statements on its website were all submitted for
review to lawyers and regulators, says Mr. Hofer.
Mr. Chow was valedictorian of his high-school class and, as a
first-year undergraduate, is taking an MBA course on financial analysis and
valuation at Berkeley’s business school. His professor in that class, Panos
Patatoukas, says Mr. Chow is “in the top 1%” of students he has taught at any
Mr. Miller, the friend who asked for Mr. Chow’s advice, still
holds the fund after his financial planner advised him to keep it. Even so, this
young investor is living proof that there is still scope for humans to analyze
investments in a financial world dominated by machines.
Write to Jason Zweig at email@example.com