Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Professional views of activist fund's pioneering support of a social issue selected to attract potential investors and allies

 

For reports of the campaign addressed below in financial media for broader investor audiences, see

 

Source:  Activist Insight | Activism this week, January 12, 2017 newsletter

Friday January 12, 2018

 

 


 

[commentary of Josh Black, editor]

 

The announcement by Jana Partners and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) of a campaign to force Apple to enhance parental controls on its iPhones by tinkering with software has understandably dominated the airwaves for much of the week.

 

With no financial or governance criticisms apparent, this is indeed a new departure for an activist. And Apple, for all its wealth, remains a peculiarly vulnerable company – few others would be guaranteed the same media scrutiny (perhaps Wells Fargo, chosen as a likely target by Reuters’ Breakingviews survey respondents, would come close).

 

While most will judge the campaign by its immediate outcomes, both on Apple’s share price and on the steps it takes to address the investors’ concerns, the pivotal issue will be how successful Jana is at raising assets for its Jana Impact Capital fund. CalSTRS, which has nearly $800 million invested with environmental, social and governance (ESG) specialists, is finalizing external manager proposals for four new ESG mandates after a year’s search but has no immediate plans to invest in Jana’s new fund, a spokesperson told me yesterday.

 

Activists have already dialed up their commitments to ESG issues, leading to some frustration on the management side that issuers have been on the defensive. Nelson Peltz this week said his Trian Partners were “big believers” in ESG, while Blue Harbour Group signed the United National Principles on Responsible Investment (UNPRI) last year. ValueAct Capital Partners says on its website that investing in and managing companies for the long term “requires the highest standards of integrity, a deep understanding of industry structure and business strategy, and a consideration of relevant social, ethical and environmental issues.”

 

Some of these efforts are viewed with more credibility than others, but there is widespread evidence that it is activists, rather than companies, that are internalizing the mood of the times. Few have been placed on the defensive quite as much as Bill Ackman, who once faced questions about how he squares investing in Oreo-manufacturer Mondelez with criticism of “society-damaging” Coca-Cola.

 

In any case, fundraising on the back of ESG is both new and interesting. Activists' assets under management appear to be stagnating, or growing slowly. In contrast, the impact investment market is already $114 billion and growing 17-18% per year, according to the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN). Just 14% of the total is invested in public equities, and given the long/short equity hedge fund community has had a tough time with pension funds recently, the opportunity is obviously too good to pass up.

 

At the very least, subscribing to ESG principles ticks a few boxes on due diligence questionnaires. A successful launch for Jana Impact could change how seriously activists take the topic. Already, Jana has won praise for being ahead of its peers. CamberView Partners, a shareholder engagement advisory firm, says Jana’s campaign will give Barry Rosenstein’s firm a “‘halo’ effect” among the investment community.

 

With Exxon’s shareholder proposal woes last year, issuers had plenty of warning about the importance of ESG engagements. Less noticed this week, Hermes EOS launched its U.S. stewardship efforts with the hiring of Tim Youmans from CECP: The CEO Force for Good. Hermes, the former British Telecom pension fund manager, still invests for some clients but has also carved out a business engaging with companies on behalf of asset owners. The first full week of 2018 suggests that the pressure is going to be applied faster than expected, and from unexpected quarters.

 


 

Copyright © 2018 Activist Insight

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.