Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum reference:

Professional reactions to commentary on use of new communication tools to restrict instead of expand investor access

 

For the commentary to which the editorial below responds, and for references to other reactions, see

Note: The "Shareholder Forum" service that Broadridge Financial Solutions offers to support its "Virtual Shareholder Meeting" product, presented in its website linked in the article below, was introduced by Broadridge in  the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program but is not related in any way to the trademarked Shareholder Forum™ owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc. We have asked Broadridge to use a different name for their service that does not suggest Forum support or endorsement, or any determination that Broadridge's services conform with the 2010 Forum program's marketplace definition of "Standards for Fair Conduct of Shareholder Meetings Using Electronic Communications."

 

Source: Bloomberg View, April 12, 2017 editorial

 

 

 

Shareholders' Meetings Should Keep It Real

LET THE INVESTORS BE HEARD. PHOTOGRAPHER: CHRISTOF STACHE/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

 

April 12, 2017 6:00 AM EDT

 

U.S. public companies are moving away from the traditional shareholders' meeting, opting instead to interact with investors online. Sensible as this might seem in the internet age, it's important to ensure that it becomes a way to improve -- rather than stifle -- communication.

The annual general meeting is among the most hallowed institutions of American capitalism: an opportunity, once a year, for owners to ask their company's executives and directors any question. Online participation can expand access and reduce travel costs, which helps explain why more than 150 companies -- including HP Inc., Comcast Corp. and PayPal Holdings Inc. -- have gone completely virtual over the past few decades.

The problem is, virtual meetings can also enable companies to shut down valuable dialogue. Online, it's easier to cut off awkward lines of inquiry (something that commonly happens, for example, on the quarterly conference calls where companies report their earnings). As recently as last year, virtual-meeting service Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. actually touted the ability to "privately view and manage" shareholder questions. Many companies offer audio participation only, meaning investors can't see executives' reactions, or in some cases even know who's present.

Granted, physical meetings can waste a lot of time, or worse. Gadflies and protesters can monopolize the events, inundating executives with invective that has little to do with performance. That said, at crucial moments the meetings can matter. In one notorious instance, back in 2006, Robert Nardelli's contemptuous refusal to answer questions at a Home Depot Inc. annual meeting played a pivotal role in his ultimate ouster as CEO. And over the past several years, Exxon Mobil Corp. investors have pushed the company to recognize and adapt to climate change, with some success.

In other words, the physical shareholders' meeting offers a valuable complement to the virtual. It guarantees that the people most motivated to monitor companies' performance can, if necessary, hold executives to account in person. Even if the opportunity is rarely used, the benefits accrue to everyone by discouraging the kind of bad management that can undermine growth and that has all too frequently tarnished the reputation of U.S. capital markets.

How, then, to maintain the in-person tradition? In principle, executives and directors ought to recognize that it's good for their companies and therefore a matter of their own enlightened self-interest. If that doesn't work, the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ -- gatekeepers to the ranks of the most prestigious public companies -- ought to make in-person annual meetings, with or without online participation, a requirement for listing.

To contact the senior editor responsible for Bloomberg View’s editorials: David Shipley at davidshipley@bloomberg.net.

 


©2017 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved 

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.