Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum reference:

Proxy voting expert's views of board responsibility for understanding shareholder constituency interests, including retail investors

 

Source: Nasdaq Boardroom Resources, April 11, 2017 interview

When & Why Proxy Votes Are Becoming Increasingly Important to Boards

Episode Summary

With respect to proxy voting, times have certainly changed over the last decade. Boards are getting involved (and/or being pulled into) more voting situations on a broader range of issues. Amid heightened levels of shareholder activism, boards are receiving more attention and push-back related to say on pay and board composition. Good intelligence and a thorough understanding of the company’s voter base has never been more important than it is today as boards seek to mitigate foreseeable hurdles or risks.

In this episode, Ron Schneider (Director of Corporate Governance Services for Donnelley Financial Solutions) also draws on his experience as a proxy solicitor to revisit the introduction of e-proxies and the impact it has had on retail shareholder voting. Schneider lists several reasons why boards are becoming more involved in proxy voting situations, and he also outlines a roadmap for boards that are looking to ensure good voter turnout. Throughout the episode, we touch on the following:

  • What hot-button topics are demanding board attention this proxy season?

  • Nearly ten years after e-voting was introduced, what effect has it had on retail shareholder voting? On the success of activist campaigns?

  • What key steps should boards take to encourage participation from their retail voters?

}

Boards have to know their company’s ownership or voter profile. You can have two competitors that are the same size and have a lot of the same characteristics—but they could have completely different ownership profiles. Quite often, people make that mistake [about their peers]… While the corporate secretary and investor relations certainly knows this, it’s important for board members to track the on-going shift in the composition of their ownership.

— Ron Schneider, Donnelley Financial Solutions

Boards have to know their company’s ownership or voter profile. You can have two competitors that are the same size and have a lot of the same characteristics—but they could have completely different ownership profiles. Quite often, people make that mistake [about their peers]… While the corporate secretary and investor relations certainly knows this, it’s important for board members to track the on-going shift in the composition of their ownership.— Ron Schneider, Donnelley Financial Solutions

Schneider proceeds to outline several steps that boards can take to be both informed and proactive in proxy voting situations. As we head into this topsy turvy proxy season, you’re not going to want to miss this episode!

 

  ©2017 Boardroom Resources LLC.

 

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.