Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum reference:

Statistics show renewal of old levels of campaigns resulting from increased number and noise of activist funds

 

Source: FactSet SharkRepellent | Research Spotlight: December 15, 2015 article

Research Spotlight

Record-Setting Year for Activism
New York - December 15, 2015
John Laide

With a little over two weeks left in 2015, a record-setting 355 activist campaigns have already been announced against US incorporated companies, topping the previous record of 353 set in 2008. These high-impact activist campaigns - those focused on value creation, public short, board seat, and officer/director removal, hit a post-financial crisis low of 219 announced in 2010 but have steadily risen every year since. Despite the record volume, 2015 will most likely be remembered for the quality of the companies targeted which included 33 Fortune 500 companies. The list includes campaigns against household names American Express Company, American International Group, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, General Electric Company, General Motors Company, Macy's Inc, QUALCOMM Incorporated and Xerox Corporation.

Activists have also had a record year in terms of campaigns resulting in board seats. As of December 14th, 127 campaigns resulted in at least one board seat for the activist (or where the activist had a meaningful say in the appointment of a new independent director). The data includes all campaigns resulting in board seats attained via a vote at a proxy fight, to settle a proxy fight, granted as part of other activist campaigns, or granted to prominent activists that are Schedule 13D filers but have not publicly agitated at the company, and is based on the date that the seat was granted or won.

 

© 2001-2014 FactSet Research Systems Inc.

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.