Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

investor rights to intrinsic value realization


Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also 2011-2019 analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings




Forum distribution:

Investors question wisdom of using capital to manipulate stock price instead of to produce goods and services


For the referenced report of stock repurchase trends, see

For other reports of the long term investor interests addressed in the article below, including cited examples and research, see the "Stock Buyback Policy" section of the reference page for the Forum's 2014 Walgreen project.


Source: The Wall Street Journal | CFO Journal, September 22, 2015 article



CFO Journal

12:11 pm ET
Sep 22, 2015


Buybacks Take Tumble Amid Wary Debt Investors


By Maxwell Murphy

US dollar bill. Big companies slashed spending on share repurchases in recent months.

—Getty Images

As debt-fueled share repurchases increasingly worry bond investors, large companies sharply curtailed overall buybacks in recent months.

S&P 500 companies spent $134.4 billion on repurchases during the three months ending July 31,  according to FactSet.  That’s off nearly 7% sequentially from the April period.

FactSet said companies bought back 2.8% of its aggregate shares outstanding during the year ended in July, which was the smallest showing for the index in more than four years. Even with the decrease, companies still spent more 8% more on buybacks than they generated in in free cash flow, or operating cash flow less capital expenditures.

Companies hadn’t outspent their quarterly free cash flow on buybacks since the October period in 2009.

Activist investors are pushing companies to return more cash to shareholders, even at the expense of capital expenditures. In an era of tepid global growth, buybacks can also goose per-share earnings at a better clip than underlying net income increases. For executives whose bonuses are tied to EPS growth, this can mean bigger paydays.

Last year, 22 companies in the index posted higher EPS solely due to reducing their share count.

Historically low interest rates also mean companies with generous dividends can issue debt with coupons lower than their dividend yields, meaning a swift buyback will more than pay for itself.

But bond investors remain wary of using debt proceeds for buybacks rather than investments in the business. “In terms of an orange-level alert, or a red-level alert, I think we’re at an orange level,” Putri Pascualy, a portfolio manager at Pacific Alternative Asset Management Co., said in June.


Copyright ©2015 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.


This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.