Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

SEC encouraged to consider business performance instead of stock price for rule to report executive compensation metrics

 

Jon Lukomnik, the Executive Director of the IRRC Institute, has offered the letter below for Forum participants' consideration of the comments he has submitted to the SEC in relation to its Proposed Rule: Pay Versus Performance (File No.: S7-07-15), suggesting their attention to research supporting measurements of business operating performance as an alternative to stock price "TSR" as the basis for management incentives to create long term enterprise value.

For previous Forum attention to the proposed SEC rule and the related IRRC sponsored research (with a link to the full study), see

Forum participants are encouraged to offer their own comments directly to the SEC (here), or to the Forum for either attributed or anonymous reporting.

 

Source: IRRC Institute, May 6, 2015 email

[For the referenced report that accompanied this letter, click here.]


 

From:

"Jon Lukomnik" <Jon@irrcinstitute.org>

 

To:

rule-comments@sec.gov

Sent:

Wed, 06 May 2015 09:18:12 -0400

Subject:

File Number S7-07-15

To the SEC Commissioners and SEC Staff:

I write with regard to the proposed "pay for performance" rule. 

The Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute (IRRCIi) is a not-for-profit research organization which originates, commissions and disseminates objective research of interest to investors about capital market, corporate governance and sustainability issues.

We are fiercely non-advocacy. For that reason we take no position on the proposed rule. However, we have recently published research which we believe can help inform the Commission in its deliberations on the rule. "The Alignment Gap Between Creating Value, Performance Measurement, and Long Term Incentive Design" was authored by Organizational Capital Partners  It has received much attention in the field for its analysis of the relationship between economic value creation and executive compensation, as well as the findings.

Among the issues analyzed by the report which would seem directly relevant to the proposed rule are:
- Performance metrics, including total shareholder return, relative total shareholder return, economic profit, return on invested capital and others.
- Performance measurement periods

Among the questions the report may engender with relation to the proposed rule are
- Is total shareholder return the appropriate metric and/or whether it should be supplemented with operating metric(s)?
- Is the proposed measurement period -- one-year TSR over each of five years -- appropriate given that the delivered pay may have been triggered and calculated based a rolling three-year three year or longer performance period for most long-term incentive plans?

A full copy of the report is enclosed. Both I and the authors of the study would welcome any questions and are available should SEC staff desire any further information.

Sincerely, 


Jon Lukomnik
Executive Director
IRRC Institute

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.