Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

investor rights to intrinsic value realization


Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also 2011-2019 analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings




Forum reference:

Activist advisor's views of professional defense playbooks


Source: Financial Times, October 5, 2014 article and video > companies > financials >

Financial Services


October 5, 2014 5:03 pm
Take the fight to activists, says Moelis

Tom Braithwaite and Ed Hammond in New York

Companies under siege from activist investors are surrendering too easily, according to Ken Moelis, the investment banker, whose advisory firm has represented some of the most prominent activists.

After a week in which Ebay acceded to the demands of Carl Icahn, the veteran activist, and agreed to spin off its PayPal unit, Mr Moelis said advisers to such companies were relying on old and ineffective strategies, likening them to “the Maginot line”, the doomed French defence which was bypassed by Nazi invaders in the second world war.

“You put up an expensive wall with gun turrets and the activists end up going around it,” he told the Financial Times. “I think there is a lot of room to be more inventive and more aggressive in the process.”

Moelis & Co, which Mr Moelis took public this year, represented Herbalife, the seller of nutritional supplements, in its fight with Bill Ackman, the hedge fund investor, who has shorted the stock and accused the company of operating a pyramid scheme. Herbalife has denied Mr Ackman’s allegations.

In an unusual move during that battle, Moelis approached investors in Mr Ackman’s fund, Pershing Square Capital Management, to argue that the hedge fund could be making a costly mistake.

But Moelis has also represented activists, such as Starboard Value, an activist investor, which urged Smithfield Foods to break itself up.

Mr Moelis argued that companies which give in to activists’ demands, such as the right to appoint board members or a large share buyback, were mistaken and being given bad advice from banks mounting the defence.

“People are addressing these things as if they’re up against some force that has powers. They are not. They are up against human beings with probably more weaknesses than your company has. I’m looking forward to some people entering the fight with the idea they can win.”

He questioned whether clients of the large banks were able to overcome potential conflicts given the lucrative trading commissions and prime brokerage fees they made from some hedge fund activists. “Can you really fight an activist using the full range of options if you are their prime broker or if they are a very large client of your equities division?” he said.

Mr Moelis is unlikely to attract the attention of activist shareholders at his company – even after going public in April – because he used the controversial ploy of holding shares with higher voting rights, which gives him control despite only owning a third of the company.


} You put up an expensive wall with gun turrets and the activists end up going around it. I think there is a lot of room to be more inventive and more aggressive in the process ~

- Ken Moelis

The initial public offering fell short of the proposed range. Mr Moelis said that was due to circumstances outside the company’s control, such as “a slight invasion of Ukraine”, which spooked investors.

But he said he never considered delaying the share sale: “These firms are all about momentum, zeitgeist and atmosphere – and the atmosphere was ‘let’s get this done’.” Shares in Moelis, which listed at $25, closed last week at $34.36, valuing it at $1.9bn. Moelis has enjoyed the pick-up in deal activity.

Mr Moelis took an uncompromising view of one element of the strong M&A environment: the spate of “tax inversion” deals done by American companies, which acquire a company in a different country in order to relocate their headquarters and pay lower taxes.

Mr Moelis, who recently hired the former Republican politician Eric Cantor, said the Obama administration was taking the wrong approach by trying to discourage the deals. “I think what’s going on in the government right now is an attempt to make enough noise and create enough controversy that you tip the scales just a little bit toward uncertainty.”

He said: “The United States should be the leading capitalist force in the world. We should cut our corporate tax rate.”


© The Financial Times Ltd 2014



This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.