Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Strategies of "a golden era" for professional activists and advisors

 

For the reports summarized in the article below, see

 

Source: Value Walk, August 13, 2014 article

Activist Investing Gains Steam In 2014

by Mark Melin

August 13, 2014, 8:15 am

First half of the year saw strong gains in number of campaigns but shifting market dynamics are accompanied by changes in stock category and strategy type

The first half of 2014 has been a strong period for activist investors, but there are signs activism is transforming as market conditions shift, according to a new report from Activist Insight.

Activist investing doubled between 2010 and 2013

The report notes that activism has more than doubled between 2010 and 2013, and the strategy is up 7.3 percent in the first six months of 2014. In the first six months of 2014 there were 161 activist campaigns, up from 150 over the same period last year.

The first half of 2014 has seen a rise in campaigns targeting small cap stocks, up from 25 percent to 32 percent. Large cap stocks, by contrast, saw a significant drop in activism, down from 15 percent in the first half of 2013 to 8 percent in 2014. The report explains this by looking at Carl Icahn’s campaigns with Apple and eBay, in which he was “not fully satisfied in his demands at either company.”

Activist Insight’s Josh Black, who edited the Half-Year Review: “These trends suggest that even when presented with rising equity markets, activist investors are resourceful enough to find new opportunities. Talk of a peak in activism seems to be an exaggeration.”

US, a prime target for activist investing campaigns

Activist campaigns continued to be primarily taking place in the US, which saw the strongest growth, while strategy strength in Canada and Japan didn’t change much year over year.  In Europe many of the activist campaigns are taking place behind closed doors, according to The Blackstone Group L.P. (NYSE:BX)’s John Studzinski.

In terms of campaign goals, gaining board seats, governance and mergers and acquisitions all topped the list.  Blackstone’s Studzinski said that activism is becoming “more sophisticated.” Rather than just targeting stock buybacks or enhanced dividends, activists are asking about the company’s five-year plan, Studzinski noted in the report.


Tech sector see a significant drop in activist investing

In terms of activist target market, the tech sector has seen a significant drop in activism, down 36 percent. This follows a pronouncement by Greenlight Capital’s David Einhorn in a first quarter investor letter that “a clear consensus that we are witnessing our second tech bubble in 15 years.”

At this point of the year, the report notes it is too early to determine the relative success of the activist strategy by making year over year comparisons. A total of 86 activist demands are outstanding, “enough to change the finely balanced levels of success and failure,” the report notes. However, 2014 is looking like a strong year, as activists who have either partially achieved their goals or who have reached compromise or settlement with a firm has already outpaced the absolute numbers for the first half of 2013.

To date, 51 percent of concluded activist campaigns have gone in the activists favor, while an additional 12 percent were partially successful, the report noted.

Below is a brief summary from Activist Insight

Activism continues to grow

  • With 127 public activist campaigns recorded in the US in the first six months of 2014, the level of activism there is likely to surpass that of last year (H1 2013: 114, FY 2013: 207).

  • In a foreword for the Half-Year Review OIshan Frome Wolosky Partners Steve Wolosky and Andy Freedman describe the current climate as “a golden era” for shareholder activism.

  • To date in 2014, Olshan Frome Wolosky’s Equity Investment & Activist Practice has already surpassed its 2013 totals, delivering 34 nomination letters, negotiating 26 settlement agreements for board representation, filing 32 initial 13D’s, and helping clients achieve board representation at a total of 30 public companies.

  • Activism maintained a steady presence in jurisdictions such as Japan and Canada.

  • In Europe, publicly declared activist campaigns fell slightly from 23 to 19 targeted companies in the first half of 2014, although there were similar levels of activism in the UK, France, Italy, Germany and Scandinavia.

  • Activists are more private outside of North America, so it is hard to draw the conclusion that activism is less prevalent this year.

Table 1. Number of companies publicly targeted by activists

Jurisdiction

H1 2014

YOY % Change

H1 2013

US

127

11.4%

114

Europe

19

-17.4%

23

Canada

6

0.0%

6

Japan

3

0.0%

3

Australia

3

200.0%

1

Other

2

-33.3%

3

 
Large-caps are no longer so popular

  • In 2013, activist launched campaigns at over 40 large-cap companies, nearly twice as many as in 2012.

  • However, this rate of increase slowed in the first half of 2014, with campaigns at large-cap companies falling seven percentage points.

  • That said, the larger proportion of activist investing has always been in the small- and mid-cap space ($250 million to $2 billion, and $2 billion to $10 billion respectively).

Table 2. Activist-targeted companies by market-cap

 

H1 2014

H1 2013

Nano-Cap

12%

15%

Micro-Cap

25%

26%

Small-Cap

32%

25%

Mid-Cap

22%

20%

Large-Cap

8%

15%

 
Activists are moving from the tech sector to services

  • The number of technology companies where activists have launched public campaigns fell 36% between 2013 and 2014, with the news suggesting a partial retreat from campaigns like those at Dell, Microsoft and Apple.

  • However, with eBay, Juniper Networks and Riverbed all in play during the first half of 2014, there may be more to come.

  • Activists have been particularly drawn to companies where the potential for creative schemes involving real estate exists, while also favouring free cash flows.

  • This has led to more campaigns at restaurant chains (6 in H1 2014, against 3 in H1 2013), such as Darden, Bob Evans Foods and The Pantry, and retailers (up to 15 from 6 last year), including Family Dollar and (even more recently) PetSmart.

Table 3. Activist-targeted companies by sector

Sector

Companies Targeted

 

H1 2014

YOY % Change

H1 2013

Basic Materials

21

-4.5%

22

Conglomerates

3

50.0%

2

Consumer Goods

15

15.4%

13

Financial

24

-11.1%

27

Healthcare

16

45.5%

11

Industrial Goods

15

66.7%

9

Services

42

44.8%

29

Technology

23

-36.1%

36

Utilities

1

0.0%

1

 
Outcomes appear more dominated by settlements
 
It is too early to give a final verdict on many 
activist campaigns launched during 2014, especially those with more operational demands. Yet early indications show the number of settlements and compromises are up on last year, and that issuers are increasingly aware of either the merits of activist campaigns or the damage that losing a proxy fight can inflict on their reputations and remuneration.

 

© 2014 ValueWalk LLC

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.