Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Activists pressing long term corporate strategies based on short term tax loophole

 

Source: Wall Street Journal, August 3, 2014 article

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.  |  MARKETS


Markets

Activist Firms Join Tax-Deal Push
Hedge Fund Marcato Seeks to Interest Big Hotel Companies in Inversion Bid for InterContinental

 

By David Benoit

Aug. 3, 2014 11:49 p.m. ET

Adding the latest in-vogue deal maneuver to their playbook, activist investors are pressing for overseas mergers that can slice tax bills.

A hedge fund is gauging interest in InterContinental Hotels. Bloomberg News

 

In the latest example, Marcato Capital Management LP hired an investment bank to try to drum up interest from U.S. hotel companies that could possibly cut down on their tax bills by buying U.K.-based InterContinental Hotels Group PLC, according to people familiar with the matter.

The $3 billion activist hedge fund says it owns about a 4% stake in InterContinental and has already publicly called on the owner of the InterContinental and Holiday Inn chains to explore a deal. Now, the people said, Marcato is trying to ramp up the pressure by hiring the bank, Houlihan Lokey, and focusing on the possibility of a tax-beneficial merger.

A spokeswoman for InterContinental declined to comment.

With these deals, known as tax inversions, a U.S. company buys a foreign target and adopts its home country's domicile or that of another foreign country, with a tax rate lower than the U.S.'s relatively high 35% corporate rate. For a deal to qualify as an inversion, shareholders of the acquired company must receive stock amounting to at least 20% of the resulting entity.

The tactic has become increasingly popular this year, with companies rushing to keep up with rivals and seal deals before any policy change that thwarts them.

President Barack Obama last month called on Congress to stop the flow of companies moving abroad by changing the rules.

The wish lists of activist investors, which typically buy up shares in companies and urge strategic or financial changes, often reflect a hot trend in the market.

For much of 2013, for example, as companies bought back shares at record levels, activists ramped up pressure on the ones that didn't do so.

Activists have long pushed various moves to lower taxes. They have urged restaurant chains to put real-estate holdings into tax-efficient vehicles known as real-estate investment trusts. Energy companies have been pushed to create similar structures with their pipelines, known as master limited partnerships.

Now tax inversions are emerging as the latest wedge.

On the U.S. side, Jana Partners LLC, one of the biggest activist funds, has taken a stake in Walgreen Co. and wants the Deerfield, Ill., drugstore company to set up residency overseas. Walgreen already has the makings of a deal in place—its potential purchase of the rest of the European drug chain Alliance Boots GmbH that it doesn't already own. At issue is whether it would change its domicile for tax purposes in doing such a deal.

Doing so could cut Walgreen's effective tax rate by more than a third, analysts have said. Walgreen's shares are up about 25% this year. Walgreen has said it is looking at the option.

Meanwhile, activist William Ackman has cited tax benefits in his push, so far unwelcome, with Canada's Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. to take over Allergan Inc. of Irvine, Calif.

Sachem Head Capital Management, a $1.6 billion New York-based hedge fund, this year urged Helen of Troy Ltd. a Bermuda-based maker of personal-care products, to seek a U.S. buyer. In a public letter, the hedge fund called Helen of Troy "a potential candidate for an inversion transaction." Helen of Troy later acquired U.S. vitamin maker Healthy Directions LLC.

A memo to clients earlier this year from Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, the New York corporate-law firm known for defending clients against activists, warned "companies have now begun to experience pressure from shareholders to pursue inversion transactions."

Marcato, based in San Francisco, began building its position in InterContinental earlier this year when the hedge fund was looking for ways to gain investment exposure to the surge in tax-inversion deals, one person familiar with the fund said.

Marcato isn't worried about Congress changing the rules on inversions because it doesn't expect it to happen soon, according to a person familiar with the firm's thinking. The hedge fund also believes there are more than just tax reasons for an InterContinental deal, as a combination could include cost cuts or other strategic benefits, the person said.

There has already been media speculation InterContinental could be attractive to such U.S. companies as Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. and Wyndham Worldwide Corp.

Yet there has been no deal, and the speculation has driven up the price of InterContinental shares. The company's stock is up 9.5% this year, making it a relatively expensive target with a $9.4 billion market capitalization.

Meanwhile, Starwood Friday announced an aggressive plan to buy back $1.1 billion in stock and pay a special dividend, lowering its cash pile for any deal.

Write to David Benoit at david.benoit@wsj.com

 

Copyright ©2014 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.