Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Leading activist criticizes rivals who kill the "golden goose"

 

Source: CNBC, April 30, 2014 article

 

NetNet


 

Hedge honcho: Activists killing 'golden goose'

Lawrence Delevingne | @ldelevingne

Wednesday, 30 Apr 2014 | 1:54 PM ET


 

Source: CNBC

Jeffrey Ubben, ValueAct Capital


Jeffrey Ubben, founder of $14 billion activist hedge fund firm ValueAct Capital, believes that some of his fellow corporate agitators are doing undue harm to companies.

"We better be careful we don't kill the golden goose. I think the media has to call out some of this stuff and not just celebrate the quote unquote victories of activist investors," Ubben said Tuesday on an activist investment panel at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles. "Companies might want to push back more because there is some bad behavior going on."

Ubben cited Keith Meister's recent investment via Corvex in security company ADT as an example of destructive activism.

He noted that Corvex, where Meister is managing partner, bought a stake in the company, took a seat on the board and pushed ADT to take on debt in order to buy back stock, which it did. But Corvex exited the board and sold a large amount of shares in November for about $450 million as the stock started to lose value. ADT shares continued to decline and are down more than 32 percent over the past year.

Meister, a Corvex spokesperson and ADT representatives did not respond to a request for comment.

"In the vernacular of the media, it's a win, the activist triumphs. It's a loss—the company's worse off," Ubben said of the ADT example and others. 'We have to be more balanced in how we talk about this stuff because there are some real failures out there."

Meister, a protege of Carl Icahn, previously has said the company was on a positive track.

"We initially invested in ADT because of its leading market position and its potential for creating long-term shareholder value," Meister said in a November statement announcing the end of his directorship and the sale of some of his shares back to the company.

"The board and management have achieved admirable results over the past year. ADT is now on a path to achieving its optimal capital structure and implementing a capital allocation plan that will benefit shareholders in the long run."

The company was also supportive of Corvex in the same news release, which noted that the investment firm would "continue to own a meaningful number" of shares.

"Keith and our other independent board members have been instrumental in helping management develop and implement a number of important strategic and financial changes that will create lasting value for our shareholders," ADT's chief executive, Naren Gursahaney, said in November.

Ubben also said that Carl Icahn's use of Twitter to promote his investments was damaging because it encourages everyday investors to play stocks without looking at the fundamentals of the company.

"The fact that activist investing is day trader fodder is bad," he said. "Carl tweeting is not helpful."

Icahn did not respond to a request for comment.

Investing Like an Activist

Keith Meister, Corvex Management, weighs in on the Commonwealth takeover bid.


Ubben still believes in the value of activist investing, especially ValueAct's brand of longer-term bets.

"This makes a ton of sense as an asset class," Ubben said.

—By CNBC's Lawrence Delevingne.

© 2014 CNBC LLC. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.