Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

investor rights to intrinsic value realization


Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also 2011-2019 analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings




Forum distribution:

Report of expanding "engagement" for investor support


The study referenced in the article below can be downloaded here. For reports of the early foundations of "engagement" addressed in the new study and in the initial 2011 ISS study, see


Source: Pensions & Investments, April 10, 2014 article


ISS/IRRC study: Shareholder engagement at all-time high

By Barry B. Burr  April 10, 2014 4:28 pm | Updated 4:31 pm

The level of engagement between institutional investors and U.S. companies has reached an all-time high and produced high degrees of success, ranging from constructive dialogues to changes in corporate policies, according to a study released Thursday prepared by Institutional Shareholder Services and commissioned by the Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute.

The study — Defining Engagement: An Update on the Evolving Relationship Between Shareholders, Directors, and Executives — found nearly half of investors and companies attributed say on pay — the requirement that U.S. companies conduct a non-binding shareholder vote to ratify compensation of the CEO and other top executives — as the cause for increased engagement since a 2011 study.

Among investors, 55% reported more than 10 engagements, up from 31% in the earlier study. Among companies, 47% reported initiating more than 10 engagements with investors, up from 30% three years ago.

The study defines engagement as direct contact between a shareholder and a company.

Aside from compensation, investors pointed to an increase in proxy fights and “vote no” campaigns on directors or social, environmental and governance issues as reasons for engagement. Beyond pay issues, companies cited financial results, mergers or industry-specific issues.

In measuring success, 73% of responding investors cited companies agreeing to provide additional disclosure or a change in policies or practices. Almost two-thirds of investors defined success as a constructive dialogue. Among corporate respondents, 93% cited constructive “dialogue on specific issues of concern was sufficient to make an engagement successful; while 69% of issuers said that the establishment of a dialogue, even if contentious, was sufficient to constitute success,” the study said.

The 48-page study included an online survey open from September to December 2013. The survey generated responses from 133 U.S.-listed companies with a combined market capitalization of $2.3 trillion and 82 institutional investors with a combined $17 trillion in assets under management. Investors included public employee pension funds, multiemployer pension funds, money management firms, hedge funds and mutual fund firms. The survey was followed by in-depth interviews with 20 issuers and 25 investors conducted from November 2013 to February 2014, the report said.

The study is available on the IRRC website.

— Contact Barry B. Burr at | @Burr_PI

Copyright © 2014 Crain Communications Inc.


This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.