Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Effort to measure increased influence of activism in M&A negotiations

 

The Simpson Thacher report referenced in the article below included the following chart of activist influence in M&A transactions:

For the full report, which addresses a broader range of activist trends, see

 

Source: Financial Times, February 9, 2014 article

ft.com > companies > financials >

Financial Services

 

February 9, 2014 6:59 pm

Activist investors force higher price takeovers

By Ed Hammond in New York


Corporate America’s battle with activist investors is increasingly being fought across the deal table rather than the boardroom, according to new research.

There has been a surge in the number of campaigns to force companies to pay higher prices when taking over a competitor.

In the first 10 months of 2013, hedge funds pushed for higher prices in 14 takeover attempts, achieving success in 10, according to a study from Wall Street law firm Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett.

The increase in the number of campaigns – and their success rate – is pronounced: in 2012, only one of the four campaigns to lift the price of a target company was successful.

Agitating for higher deal prices, or so-called “bumpitrage”, combines the activist predilection for audacity with the traditional practice of arbitrage by investors, who buy into a target company in the hope of the shares being acquired at a premium.

Recent successful campaigns include those against the merger of MetroPCS and T-Mobile US last year and McKesson’s $8.6bn takeover of rival drugs distributor Celesio.

Activist investor Carl Icahn mounted a successful campaign during Michael Dell’s $24.9bn buyout of the computer maker that bears his name.

After months of public fighting over the future of the business with Mr Icahn, Mr Dell and his private equity backers bumped the price to $13.88 a share from $13.65 a share. Both sides claimed a victory.

“Someone like me is not going to show up in a deal unless it’s obvious that a company is being sold too cheap,” said Mr Icahn.

“Dell was different from a classic move just to raise the price of the bid; I was prepared to invest $4bn of our own capital to make a counter-offer because we thought Michael Dell was buying it too cheaply”.

The growing success that activists enjoy in forcing higher takeout prices also reflects the rise of the industry. At the end of 2013, US activist funds had more than $90bn of assets under management, up from $39bn at the end of 2009.

“Every deal that I am working on now, the issue of whether an activist turns up in the stock and starts pushing for a higher price is one concerning boards and management,” said Mario Ponce, a partner at Simpson Thacher.

“The six million dollar question is whether this will have a chilling effect on M&A,” said Mr Ponce. “It hasn’t yet, but the spectre of it is hanging over certain types of transactions and that could spread doubt.”

 

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2014.

 

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.