Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

Forum distribution:

Activist bubble attracts more contestants

 

For an article about investor influence of the inflating activism reported below, see

 

Source: Institutional Investor Alpha, January 30, 2014 article


Activism Grows Crowded as the Rewards Remain Rich

January 30, 2014   Stephen Taub

As new names enter the market, competition and crowding increases for all funds. Will returns hold up?

Is there a bubble building in activist investing?

It does seem more crowded. In addition to the usual cast of characters, a number of new participants have joined the fray in the past few years.

They include Carl Icahn’s onetime right-hand man Keith Meister of New York–based Corvex Management; former Pershing Square Capital Management partner Richard T. McGuire III of San Francisco–based Marcato Capital Management; Jeffrey Smith of New York–based Starboard Value, one of the busiest activists these days; and Donald Drapkin of New York–based Casablanca Capital.

And several of the big activist hedge fund firms have swelled in size in recent years. Nelson Peltz’s New York–based Trian Partners has been on a fundraising spree, raising its assets to more than $7 billion from $3.7 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2012.

Jeffrey Ubben’s San Francisco–based ValueAct Capital has now topped $12 billion, more than double the $5.2 billion it managed three years ago.

There are growing signs that it could be getting harder to identify the types of stocks ripe for change or financial engineering that are typically targeted by activists. We saw signs of this frustration building in May at the Ira Sohn conference when Greenlight Capital’s David Einhorn lamented that his presentation on Oil States International had been scooped a week earlier when Barry Rosenstein’s Jana Partners filed a 13D on the energy services company.

Sure enough, in its year-end letter distributed to investors last week, Jana explained that part of the reason the fund did not perform as well as it would have liked was because of the “target-rich environment for activism,” noting that it passed on some activist situations that were on its radar screen either because management took actions to drive returns or other activists beat Jana to the opportunity.

This partly explains why it seems as if it’s increasingly common to find more than one high-profile activist independently agitating for change in the same stock.

These besieged stocks include Darden Restaurants (Barington Capital Group, Starboard Value), Sotheby’s (Third Point, Marcato Capital Management, Trian Partners), Juniper Networks (Jana Partners, Elliott Management Corp.), Oil States International (Jana, Greenlight Capital), Hertz (Corvex, Third Point) and Airbus (Jana, the Children’s Investment Master Fund).

“We have seen this happen before,” an executive at a prominent activist firm says, adding that it’s not so unusual to see more than one activist in the same stock.

So far, most activists are not suffering. Last year Trian rose about 40 percent, ValueAct 29.5 percent, Third Point 25 percent and a number of others about 20 percent, give or take a percent or two.

And many of them, such as Jana, Third Point and Greenlight, don’t exclusively engage in activist investing. They are will also go short, buy stocks for other than activist reasons and even wander away from the equities markets altogether.

Even so, activists still see good potential activist targets.

In its third-quarter letter, dated October 30, Trian told clients it continues to identify “compelling new investments” that have the potential to grow into core positions. “As of this writing, we have a substantial number of new ideas that are in various stages of the diligence/white paper process,” the activist firm added. “It is also worth noting that we tend to focus on large-cap situations where the competition from other activists is substantially less intense than the small- and mid-cap space.”

In its year-end letter, Jana told clients that it continues to find new attractive “value + catalyst opportunities,” adding, “Managements, boards and institutional shareholders are increasingly responsive to shareholder engagement.”

Indeed, you can see this in the growing number of companies willing to settle with hedge funds by agreeing to place one or two of their director candidates on the board. Many others are paying the modern version of greenmail — capitulating to the bullies by agreeing to use their cash to pay a fat, onetime dividend and/or buy back shares. Of course, all shareholders get this payoff, unlike with greenmail, but the rewards can be rich.

The most recent example: auction house Sotheby’s, which Wednesday said it would pay a $300 million special dividend to shareholders and repurchase $150 million in stock, including $25 million this year.

That wasn’t good enough for Marcato, which fired off a press release calling on Sotheby’s to return a total of $1 billion of capital to shareholders within 12 months.

© 2014 Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.