Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also 2011-2019 analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

 

For the SEC's new guidelines referenced below, see

 

Source: Financial Times, April 3, 2013 commentary

FINANCIAL TIMES

ft.com > comment > blogs >

Business blog

 

SEC’s ruling won’t make many Facebook friends

The digerati are having fun with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s ruling that US companies can use social media to distribute market-sensitive information such as earnings reports. “Facebook Flap Forces SEC Into 21st Century,” says Forbes.

Not so fast. The US regulator’s decision to drop its inquiry into Reed Hastings, Netflix’s chief executive, who boasted about new viewing figures on his personal Facebook page, is only an incremental advance into the new millennium. It makes sense for the SEC to acknowledge the growing use of social media (I’m guessing more people saw Mr Hastings’ Facebook post than have viewed any regulatory announcement in corporate history), but I don’t think the decision will prompt fearful CEOs to tweet their earnings much more than they do already – and, even if it does, it won’t make much difference to investors.

For one thing, in the SEC’s interpretation of “Reg FD” – its “fair disclosure” regulation – the watchdog points out that impromptu use of personal websites and social media channels to disseminate material non-public information would probably still breach the rules, irrespective of the number of followers or friends an executive has.

Social media channels thrive on users’ spontaneity, which is why highly regulated companies that get all their social media outpourings vetted in advance – such as investment banks – are such lame tweeters. But with the possible exceptions of Mr Hastings and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg (who wrote the official “founder’s letter” for the network’s initial public offering on his mobile phone), most chief executives are still likely to delegate social media postings to their communications, compliance or investor relations teams, using corporate accounts. It’s a shame, but there it is.

In any case, as Fortune’s Dan Primack points out, the SEC clarification falls short by not recommending that companies post their social media disclosures in a central repository, as well as on, say, Twitter and Facebook. Instead, it says companies should make “disclosures on corporate web sites identifying the specific social media channels a company intends to use for the dissemination of material non-public information”. Analysts, investors and journalists would have to subscribe to all such channels to ensure they stayed abreast of new announcements.

Expect two consequences – neither of which really advances the cause of social media, or the objective of fair disclosure:

1) another layer of regulatory boilerplate in corporate announcements (“We may on occasion distribute information via the following non-exclusive list of social media channels…” etc).

2) more dull, officially sanctioned corporate-speak clogging up your timelines.

 

© The Financial Times Ltd 2013

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.