Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

 

A press release issued by Relational Investors to announce what is reported below can be seen here, and Relational also filed a copy of its letter in an SEC Schedule 13D that can be downloaded here.

For Forum plans to address investor decisions relating to activist proposals for short term value realization, citing the Relational-Timken example as a candidate, see the December 21, 2012 Forum Report: Candidates for an Activist “Golden Goose” Analysis.

 

Source: Reuters, February 19, 2013 article

Reuters

Relational says has strong support for Timken breakup

Ralph Whitworth, principal of Relational Investors LLC, speaks at the Reuters Investment Summit in New York December 13, 2005.

NEW YORK | Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:25pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Investment firm Relational Investors LLC has strong shareholder support for its campaign to break up Timken Co (TKR.N) and will continue to press its case until the company splits into two publicly traded companies, Relational founder Ralph Whitworth said on Tuesday.

Relational, which has teamed up with a large public pension fund to push for a breakup of Timken, has heard from other investors supporting its campaign and believes that an "overwhelming majority" of Timken's public shareholders want a separation of the company, Whitworth said.

Relational is Timken's largest shareholder, and together with the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS), owns a 7.31 percent stake in the company.

In November, Relational and CalSTRS said that the diversified manufacturer should split its steel and bearings businesses to increase shareholder value. Timken has said it had considered the proposal with outside advisers but determined the time is not right for such a move.

"It appears they're hoping that if they just ignore it, it will go away. But this is not going away because we're going to persist until they maximize the value of these assets," the investor told Reuters in an interview.

The investors sent a letter to the company's board earlier on Tuesday. They have said Timken is significantly undervalued due to its combination of two different businesses and separating those units would maximize shareholder value.

"We continue to believe the company has significant cost, technology and revenue synergies between its bearing and steel businesses, as well as diversification benefits in continuing to operate under its current structure," Timken spokesman Dan Minnich said in a statement.

Shares of Timken, which makes mechanical components and high-performance steels, rose 2.2 percent to $57.49 on the New York Stock Exchange on Tuesday, valuing the company at more than $5.4 billion. Timken's stock has rallied nearly 40 percent since Relational and CalSTRS first disclosed their stake in November.

The investors believe the stock could rise to as much as $69 per share if the businesses were separated, which would eliminate misunderstandings of the assets by investors who specialize in the different sectors.

Timken has argued to the contrary, saying the loss of diversification benefits would largely offset any near-term valuation gain that might result from a separation of the businesses.

Timken's second and third-largest shareholders collectively own a 10.8 percent stake and are both affiliated with the company or its founding family, possibly making the activist campaign a challenge.

But the investors have enough shareholder support outside of the family to allow them to ultimately prevail, Whitworth said.

"We have had incoming calls into us, encouraging us and urging us to move forward and expressing support. Now we'll proactively go out and reach out to the shareholder base," he said. "We are confident that an overwhelming majority of public shareholders want a separation of the company and will support the proposal."

Several diversified conglomerates have decided to break up in recent years to focus on core businesses and streamline operations, often under pressure from activist investors.

Whitworth pressured industrial conglomerate ITT Corp (ITT.N) to split up its defense and water purifying businesses. Other companies that have pursued break-ups or major divestitures include Tyco International (TYC.N), Kraft Foods Inc (KRFT.O) and Fortune Brands (FBHS.N).

(Reporting by Soyoung Kim in New York; additional reporting by A. Ananthalakshmi in Bangalore and Michael Erman in New York; editing by Carol Bishopric)


©2013 Thomson Reuters.

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.