Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

 

For a copy of the letter from Southeastern Asset Management to Dell referenced in the article below, see

Note: For past Forum attention to shareholder interests in valuations of proposed transactions, see the programs addressing Providian Financial Corporation (2005) and The Bear Stearns Companies (2008).

 

Source: Wall Street Journal, February 10, 2013 article

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.


BUSINESS   |   Updated February 10, 2013, 8:06 p.m. ET

Investor Aims High With Price For Dell


By SHARON TERLEP, DAVID BENOIT and TELIS DEMOS

Dell Inc.'s largest outside shareholder faces an uphill battle in its effort to squeeze billions more out of the planned $24.4 billion deal to take the tech giant private.

Southeastern Asset Management on Friday laid out a case that Dell is worth $24 a share—$10 a share more than the current deal—and is urging other shareholders to join the opposition. If Southeastern succeeds, it could result in a richer deal for investors or an altered structure for the leveraged buyout.

The Memphis-based investment firm owns 8.5% of Dell's outstanding shares, and people familiar with discussions said the architects of the buyout aren't taking the firm's opposition lightly.

One problem, though: The last time Dell traded at $24 a share was in mid-2008.

Southeastern's pronouncement in effect sets up a game of chicken. If Dell and its buyers don't secure the needed shareholder support, the deal could cost the buyers more—or collapse altogether. If the deal falls through, shareholders risk seeing the deal premium evaporate and their holdings lose value.

Under the deal, the largest leveraged buyout since the financial crisis, Dell founder Michael Dell and the investment firm Silver Lake Partners are offering $13.65 a share to take the company private. The offer price represents a 25% premium to Dell's closing price the day before deal talks became public. But it is well below the more than $18 a share Dell's stock traded at a year ago.

On Friday, Dell shares were up 10 cents at $13.63 in 4 p.m. trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

A person familiar with the matter estimated that Southeastern paid an average price for Dell of about $16.90, when factoring in all accounts managed by the firm.

In a lengthy analysis filed on Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Southeastern argued that Dell is worth more than the offer and that the company would likely generate a better return to shareholders if it were to sell pieces of the business. Southeastern also outlined other options it said would be more attractive to shareholders than the proposed buyout, including a one-time dividend funded with Dell's cash and some debt, or a buyout that gave current shareholders an opportunity to participate.

Dell on Friday said a special committee of its board "considered an array of strategic alternatives" and determined the proposed buyout is the best offer for shareholders. A Dell spokesman had no additional comment.

It isn't uncommon for shareholders to balk at a deal as a tactic to pressure buyers into making a higher offer. But shareholders have an uneven record in driving up the price of an initial offer for a company, data show, and Dell investors may be wary of shooting down the current deal amid a lengthy decline in the company's fortunes.

But Southeastern's efforts could be buoyed by discontent from other investment managers, many of whom bought stock at a much higher price than the offer.

Some smaller shareholders have already said they will oppose the deal. "I think this is going to be a close vote; this is not going to be a runaway for Michael Dell," said Richard Pzena, co-chief investment officer at Pzena Investment Management Inc., which owns less than 1% of Dell as of the most recent public filing, according to Ipreo, a capital-markets data firm. He said he planned to vote against the deal.

"I think they're counting on the notion that people are going to be afraid that if the deal falls apart, the stock price is going to go down," said Mr. Pzena. "I don't think it's going to go down, or [it will] go down very little, given how strong the other lookalike tech stocks have done since this deal came about."

The extent that Southeastern is able to influence the deal should become clearer in coming weeks as each side works to line up allies, but a resolution could be months away. Dell has 45 days to shop for a bidder with a better offer under a provision of the agreement intended to ensure shareholders get the best deal.

The shareholder vote on the deal will require the majority of the shareholders to support the deal, excluding about 16% of shares held by Mr. Dell, his family and other insiders.

Southeastern is the largest independent shareholder in Dell, and said in a filing it holds an 8.5% stake, though Southeastern lacks voting rights on a small portion of those shares.

According to one estimate, 20% of shares are in the hands of shareholders who would benefit from a sale. After word first emerged of a buyout some three weeks before the deal was announced, more than half of Dell shares changed hands, said Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi. He estimated that it is likely more than 20% of shares are now in the hands of merger-arbitrage traders, who bet on minute price changes ahead of a merger and who are likely to support a deal. Mr. Sacconaghi said it "would be difficult" for Southeastern to gather enough support to block the deal.

Some 58% of shares are held by investment managers, according to S&P Capital IQ, funds like T. Rowe Price Group Inc. and BlackRock Inc. These and other big firms haven't indicated publicly where they stand.

—Jason Zweig contributed
to this article.

A version of this article appeared Feb. 11, 2013, on page B1 in some U.S. editions of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Investor Aims High With Price For Dell.

Copyright ©2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.