Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

 

The archived webcast of the Agrium analyst conference reported below can be accessed here, and the associated slide presentation can be downloaded here. A subsequent January 29, 2013, CNBC interview: "Agrium CEO: Our Stock Is Up; Nothing to Do with Jana," can be seen in this video:

The JANA Partners response to the conference and a published interview of Agrium's CEO is presented with proxy solicitation statements in this press release:

For Forum plans to address investor decisions relating to activist proposals for short term value realization, citing the Jana-Agrium example as a candidate, see the December 21, 2012 Forum Report: Candidates for an Activist “Golden Goose” Analysis.

 

Source: Reuters, January 28, 2013 article

Reuters

Agrium fires back at Jana's plan to split company

By Rod Nickel

Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:29pm EST

(Reuters) - Canadian fertilizer company Agrium Inc (AGU.TO) (AGU.N) will not split its wholesale and retail divisions as its biggest shareholder, Jana Partners, wants because doing so would "destroy value" for shareholders, Chief Executive Mike Wilson said on Monday.

Wilson was speaking in New York to Agrium's sell-side analysts in an attempt to blunt Jana's move to replace some of Agrium's board and effect changes that Jana says would increase returns to investors. He ruled out a break-up of the company, and released a sharply higher earnings forecast for the fast-growing retail division, which sells seed, fertilizer and chemicals to farmers.

Wilson said Jana preferred to talk to Agrium's shareholders and analysts rather than to the company itself, although Agrium and Jana had reached an understanding last spring that they would keep their talks on improving the company private.

"They'll say one thing and do the opposite ... They're good at breaking up companies," Wilson said. "They're very good at saying, 'Why not just engage some ideas?' The answer is, if we do, we'll destroy value for our company, and we're not about to do that."

The company forecast that EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) for the retail business would climb to $1.3 billion by 2015, up from its previous target of $1 billion and a jump of over two thirds from 2011. The growth will come mainly from its pending purchase of Viterra's retail chain, smaller buys and organic growth, Agrium said.

The revised forecast comes after the company boosted its fourth-quarter profit outlook on Thursday.

Wilson said a share buyback last year and increases in the company's dividend have had nothing to do with the pressure put on Agrium, the largest U.S. farm retailer, by Jana.

Shares of Agrium, which has a market cap of $17.1 billion, were down 0.8 percent by midafternoon on Monday in New York and Toronto, but were still near record highs.

The company has grown dramatically from a market cap of just $2.1 billion a decade ago, acquiring U.S. farm retailers Royster Clark and United Agri Products (UAP) in 2006 and 2008 respectively, and Australia's AWB Landmark in 2010.

Wilson said Agrium is not planning any major acquisitions beyond its pending purchase of most of the Viterra farm retail business in Canada and Australia from Glencore International PLC (GLEN.L).

Rising grain prices during the past five years, especially due to growing demand in China and India, and recurring drought in key farming areas have helped push Agrium's stock higher. It has also benefited from dropping prices for natural gas, a key ingredient in making nitrogen-based fertilizers.

Jana, a New York based hedge fund that owns 6 percent of Agrium, said the presentation marks Agrium's first detailed response to its questions since it started raising them about eight months ago.

But it said Agrium failed to address the key problem of a lack of relevant experience and shareholder input on the board, and chided the company for being dismissive and thin-skinned.

"Nowhere has Agrium made a case that shareholders would not benefit from the experience and shareholder perspective that our candidates bring, nor have they explained why shareholders should have blind faith in a board which repeatedly failed to address basic issues like capital allocation and disclosure until we pressed them to do so," Jana said in a statement.

Along with splitting the wholesale and retail divisions, Jana wants the company to make better use of capital, control retail and corporate costs and improve disclosure.

Wilson said keeping Agrium's wholesale side - which produces nitrogen and mines potash and phosphate - combined with its chain of farm retail stores, helps the company understand supply and demand fundamentals, giving it an advantage in a highly competitive sector.

While Agrium said it is wary of releasing too much detail that its privately held competitors could use, the company addressed each of Jana's suggestions.

Jana has raised concerns about the geographic overlap among Agrium's more than 900 farm retail stores in North America. But vice-president of distribution Tom Warner said Agrium has closed 20 percent of its U.S. farm stores in the past seven years, and needs to remain in some areas to win farmers' business.

Jana has also criticized Agrium for maintaining working capital for the retail division at too high a level. Agrium countered by saying that its ratio of working capital to revenues is lower than that of UAP, before Agrium acquired it.

In November, Jana nominated a slate of five candidates to Agrium's 11-member board to buttress its demand that the company split up its wholesale and retail divisions.

Agrium has one director retiring this year, but Wilson downplayed suggestions the company could appease Jana by giving it more influence.

"There's no reason for us to want to give them a seat on the board," he said in a later conference call with reporters.

(Reporting by Rod Nickel in Winnipeg, Manitoba; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick, Jim Marshall and Peter Galloway)
 


©2013 Thomson Reuters.

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.