Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

See related case examples of

Dell Inc.

appraisal rights for intrinsic value realization

and

Walgreen Co.

stock buyback policies

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

For graphs of specific company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

For graphs of specific company voting for the past 5 years, see

Shareholder Support Rankings

 

 

 

 

For the report summarized in the article below, see

 

Source: CFO Journal / The Wall Street Journal, January 23, 2013 article

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.


CFO Journal.


January 23, 2013, 12:11 PM ET

Activists Sought and Won Board Seats in 2012: Report


 

[James Willhite]

Activist investors hungrily sought board representation last year. And in most cases, they got what they wanted, according to a new report from Activist Insight.

Among the 135 activist campaigns tracked in the report, 58 put forward board candidates and, of those, 45, or 80%, were successful. Activists most often won board seats through access to the company’s proxy, the report said.

The next most popular strategy was to push for a company to sell itself, with 28 of the 135 campaigns pushing for such a move, as Carl Icahn successfully did with both Par Pharmaceutical and Amylin Pharmaceuticals. A push for a spin-off or sale of a business division occurred 26 times, the removal of a chief executive or other board member was sought 23 times, and in 16 instances investors sought to force a company to initiate a share repurchase plan. The report did not include success rates for those goals.

Financial services companies were targeted by 26% of the campaigns, the largest share in the group. Other popular industries were technology, which comprised 21% of the campaigns, and services, at 18% of the total.

The amount of money activists spent acquiring their stakes grew by 34% to just over $12 billion last year, from slightly less than $9 billion in 2011, with the average initial investment growing to around $110 million from just over $80 million the year before. At the same time, the percentage stakes that activists gained through those investments did not show a similar increase, indicating that the investors targeted larger companies, according to the report.

Copyright ©2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

 

 

This Forum program is open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the Forum's purpose is to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant is expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices, rather than investor decisions relating to only a single company. The Forum may therefore invite program support of several companies that can provide both expertise and examples of leadership relating to the issues being addressed.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.